Live data from Hacker News

Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google

forbes.com

351–360 of 379 posts

Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google

#351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be honest this just sounds like a bunch of talking points stuck together, can you write a credible argument based on known case-law/precedent/etc... if you have a legal angle to critique?

I’m saying that we have “deregulated” big-cap tech to the point of not enforcing laws that we enforced even a decade ago. This is analogous to the last time a sector 100% captured the regulators which was high finance in the Greenspan era last time. Ended poorly. The likely height of big-cap tech regulation was the regulated monopoly of ATT/Bell Labs/Western Digital all through the 20th century. I prefer the outcomes…

I never claimed to have “fail to understand my point” ? Are you sure your not misreading something?

Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google

#352

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m saying that we have “deregulated” big-cap tech to the point of not enforcing laws that we enforced even a decade ago. This is analogous to the last time a sector 100% captured the regulators which was high finance in the Greenspan era last time. Ended poorly. The likely height of big-cap tech regulation was the regulated monopoly of ATT/Bell Labs/Western Digital all through the 20th century. I prefer the outcomes…

I never claimed to have “fail to understand my point” ? Are you sure your not misreading something?

Le sigh. I said big-cap tech used to get in trouble with the DoJ a lot, but has gotten finance-good at lobbying and so they don't get slapped hard anymore. You said that I was stringing together talking points and not citing concrete examples.

Let me (start to) Google that for you:

https://www.sec.gov/enforce/sec-enforcement-actions-fcpa-cas...

https://www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-case-filings-alpha

https://www.csoonline.com/article/567531/the-biggest-data-br...

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/24/doj-files-second-antitrust-l...

https://www.channele2e.com/news/big-tech-antitrust-regulator...

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/23/technology/justice-depart...

... scads more law stuff and a decade ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust_L...

... scads more law stuff and a decade ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Cor....

Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google

#353

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nothing like what it would have been without a non-stop flood of H-1Bs

Software developers create software development jobs. H1bs are a contributor to the fact that the US is the center for the software development industry. If companies weren't deciding to headquarter in the bay area to be at the center of things, there wouldn't be nearly as much upward pressure on US developer compensation.

First of all, I don't care about the bay area, I care about the country at large. Secondly, software companies shouldn't be headquartered in the bay area when there are better states. Thirdly, you are wrongfully assuming that they all would leave the US if H-1Bs were curtailed. Fourthly, you don't specify where they would move to and how they could do without access to the labor pool here.

It doesn't have to be a race to the bottom

Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google

#354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you answered your own question, really. Although I would modify your statement slightly: Original: Selling 30M GPUs with a huge margin is more profitable than selling 60M GPUs with a modest margin. Modified: Nvidia and AMD must sell at a higher ASP because the market for discrete GPUs has shrunk from 60m to 30m/year. That's your answer! It's what I've been arguing for since my very first post. It isn't Nvidia…

> Modified: Nvidia and AMD must sell at a higher ASP because the market for discrete GPUs has shrunk from 60m to 30m/year. That makes no sense as a reason not to sell more . It also makes no sense in general because discrete GPUs aren't a distinct technology. The H100 isn't literally a bunch of RTX cards glued together, but it's approximately that and the same R&D goes into both, implying that the higher demand for t…

It makes sense because there is now less demand for midrange GPUs than before. But high end GPUs have either increased demand or stay the same, making high end GPUs more lucrative.

You seem to think that midrange market shrunk in volume because Nvidia decided to stop offering value products, is that right?

Don’t support AMD or Intel if they have inferior products. There are now plenty of GPU makers out there including Qualcomm and Apple. Let’s not become fanboys here. R/ayymd is where you want to go if you want to become a blind AMD supporter.

Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google

#355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As if it was just there for the taking. AMD doesn't have the money to do what Nvidia does

Yes they do. They were in the same ballpark until the past coupld of quarters. Nvidia laid the groundwork for this ages ago by developing drivers that play nice with NN. AMD could easily have done the same at the time, and can do so now. Even if it costs $1b-$10b to do it, AMD can afford it and it’s worth doing. They’ve got $55b in equity, and a huge $280b market cap to issue more stock into. [https:valustox.com/AMD]

Past couple of quarters? We're talking about the past. And their roadmaps go out five years. They have to spend now to get results in three to five years. What Nvidia was spending two years ago will largely determine how the next two years go.

Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google

#356

Somehow I wish it weren't true because I hate monopolies in any markets. Nvidia has been enjoying their absurd premium on consumer and production GPUs and intentionally removed the NVLink capability in the GeForce 4090 series (3090 had them) to avoid cannibalizing their A100 and H100 business. With NVLink, people could chain multiple GPUs and increase the overall VRAM without much reduction in bandwidth. But without…

Idk man, we'd need to know all of their numbers before we know whether they're assholes or not.

I mean I'm sure they're overcharging for gpus in general, but the enterprise/consumer split is always tough, technically enterprise customers are subsidising the dev and research of new tech that eventually becomes consumer gpus.

Either its 20k/1k for top end of each or its idk, 7k for everyone?

They could definitely drop prices all around though and still have a buffer for r&d left over.

Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google

#357
post #257
post #3

It seems deeply overvalued to me, as it's pretty likely that NVIDIA's competitors will have parallel computation hardware that competes well enough. I'm personally not a fan of NVIDIA's drivers or the reliability of their hardware.

> I'm personally not a fan of NVIDIA's drivers A bit funny thing is that they are essentially software company which focuses on software quality, if you look at the stats how many people are working with software over there. And still it is not good enough?

I'd welcome a lot fewer software developers, so I get drivers rather than the bloated driver lifestyle synergy experience with cloud mess. So many companies spend so much money developing software that alienates and aggravates their customers. I blame HP, who by my recollection started it with printer drivers that required a custom installer and a CD.

Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google

#358
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are right to worry about power efficiency. Though do keep in mind that power is also fungible with money, especially in a data centre. I suspect a lot of AI inference (thought probably not the majority) will happen on mobile devices in the future. There power is also at a premium, and less fungible with money.

> Though do keep in mind that power is also fungible with money, especially in a data centre. Untrue. I have filled 3 very large data centers where there was no more power to be had. Data centers are constrained by power. At some limit, you can't just spend more money to get more power. It also becomes a cooling issue, the more power your GPUs consume, the more heat they generate, the more cooling that is required, t…

You are right about any given data centre in the short run.

But you can use money to rent more data centres.

Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google

#359
post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Feel free to short sell both?

Is this the only reply you can come up with in this post? Maybe some people want to have legitimate discussions on valuations.

To expand: you can be an armchair speculator about companies being 'overvalued'. But the market consensus is what it is, and it's likely the best estimation for the expected value of the discounted future returns of the company.

(And if it's off, you can bet against that consensus.)

Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google

#360
post #358

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Though do keep in mind that power is also fungible with money, especially in a data centre. Untrue. I have filled 3 very large data centers where there was no more power to be had. Data centers are constrained by power. At some limit, you can't just spend more money to get more power. It also becomes a cooling issue, the more power your GPUs consume, the more heat they generate, the more cooling that is required, t…

You are right about any given data centre in the short run. But you can use money to rent more data centres.

Hate to break it to you. That is getting harder and harder. Certainly you can get a couple mw, but if you want 50, you are going to find that to be extremely challenging, if not impossible.
Post reply on HN