Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT for Teams

openai.com

351–360 of 453 posts

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#351
post #316

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cannot be gamed? C'mon now... You could pay a bunch of people to vote for your model in the arena.

No you can't, because you actually don't know which model is which when you vote.

Do only the initial votes count? Because after I made an initial choice I was then put in a session where I saw the name of both of the AI. I made subsequent votes in that session where I could see their names.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#352

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does anyone really trust openai isn't training on their data given their views on copyright? It would make more sense for them to just train on it anyway.

if there EULA says one thing and they do another that opens them up to huge liabilities. though anything is possible

Well "huge liabilities"... until recently I haven't seen anything resembling something a company wouldn't just say "pay the fine and do it anyway, it'll be better for our bottom line".

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#353
post #313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't want my family to know I spent 3 hours chatting about the Holy Roman Empire.

What would change if they knew?

They would know that it was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire. Discuss.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#354

A notable feature here is "no training on your business data or conversations" which really shouldn't have to be a feature. (requests using the ChatGPT API already aren't trained upon)

I don’t agree with you here. OpenAI should be free to train on your data assuming you agreed to that in the terms of service (and yes, you did). If they ask for a little more money in exchange for not having that valuable information in trade, that seems fair.

If you want an entirely free and open LLM experience, you can also run one of the ever-improving open source models on your own hardware. But for many if not most companies, paying $25/mo per user for something as amazing as ChatGPT-4 is a bargain.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#355
Here’s an idea - ChatGPT app for Apple Carplay. Right now while driving i often do “hey siri” - but instead of carrying on a conversation where I can ask clarifying questions, I am most greeted with “i cannot show you this information while driving”, because rather than summarizing the answer, Siri tries to show me some website link.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#356

OpenAI understand their tech lead isn't a sustainable moat, so are going for network effects. Similar to Slack Connect (shared channels).

Yeah, this is something I've been saying as well. Their true "moat" is their network of people who know and understand how to know use their tech.

It’s the “we will make this so easy for you that you never want to switch” moat. Definitely akin to Slack, which also has the integration glue to keep you on their platform. Even though there are many Slack alternatives now that are really great, most companies on Slack will opt to stay there rather than invest in migrating.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#357

A notable feature here is "no training on your business data or conversations" which really shouldn't have to be a feature. (requests using the ChatGPT API already aren't trained upon)

Does anyone really trust openai isn't training on their data given their views on copyright? It would make more sense for them to just train on it anyway.

My personal guess is that they don't put it in training data, BUT they still have human read what you send, to see 1. what are the innovative uses that they can try to copy/integrate; 2. optimize (both in score and throughput) for their consumer's usage.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#359

I can see some good use cases - A custom gpt just trained on your code base can help you write test cases in your desired syntax. - A custom gpt trained on internal PRDs can help brainstorm better on the next set of features. Hoping to see something good come out of this

This version of teams does not do that. You can hook it up by creating Custom GPTs and add some amount of docs to a specific GPT for retrieval, but you cannot connect an entire codebase to ChatGPT to get answers. Github[1] had introduced the feature you are talking about a year or so ago. Not sure if people are using it. Use cases I see are common ones - basic usage of ChatGPT but admin can control access. Provides a…

Github's feature is under private beta right now. I feel that it will be impactful.

UI components can be generated as per your UI guidelines, same for tests. Hoping for good things

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#360
post #313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't want my family to know I spent 3 hours chatting about the Holy Roman Empire.

What would change if they knew?

Why the questions? It is no one else's business why they want that level of privacy. Is it your intent to convince them that they don't need privacy?
Post reply on HN