Earlier quoted context omitted.
"because reasons" isn't actually a good justification for a system that's broken and corrupted beyond all repair
Do you generally assume anything potentially complicated, or anything that hasn't been specifically explained to you, is automatically specious?
It depends on whether you're talking about an instruction manual for a nuclear power plant or thousands of pages of legal nonsense.
I find higher truth value in short, simple statements like "I'm innocent as shown on the cameras" than I do when Alan Dershowitz gets on the evening news to wax poetic/philosophical about what the notion of "guilty" really means.