ublacklist works with many search engines. A little bit of very easy effort goes a LONG way to cleaning up your results. https://github.com/iorate/ublacklist And here's two bonus things you need if you make use of youtube Sponsorblock. As it says on the tin, automatically skips sponsor sections. https://github.com/ajayyy/SponsorBlock Dearrow. An open source and crowdsourced tool replace youtubes stupid fucking clickb…
Followed the Firefox link on DeArrow, and it leads to an "Oops! We can't find that page".
Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users
351–360 of 502 posts
Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users
#352Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users
#353Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users
#354Earlier quoted context omitted.
Similarly, I had no idea about this feature, but I now know I want it... I think I just need it to be cheaper, maybe $5 unlimited (or enough for me, which I think is certainly higher than 300, probably higher than 1000, at least without behaviour change) and I'd be in I assume it's a bit chicken and egg - marginal costs of new customers/extra searches is relatively low, it's the crawling & development/SRE that's expe…
Alternatively, you're only willing to pay roughly the cost of a coffee per month for something you deem as a killer feature for everyday use.
I don't think coffee's a great analogy - it has far more utility for me, I don't buy it as a service, and it costs me roughly £24 (what, $30ish) a month in beans.
I'm not seriously suggesting it because I think comparing prices of different things to determine value very quickly gets silly, but a closer comparison might be Netflix: Kagi would cost me about as much per month for search as Netflix. Silly, as I said, but if I tried really strictly to pay for things according to relative value or utility to me, there's no way that would make sense.
Part of the problem is asking me to switch from free I suppose - if DDG suddenly started charging me $5 I'd be more likely to pay Kagi $10 than I am today if that makes sense.
Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users
#355Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The single biggest deficiency of Kagi is Apple’s exclusive control over the list of selectable default search providers in iOS Safari. Seems like a deficiency of Apple products to me. I know it's beating a dead horse, but this is what happens when people willingly buy into a closed system they have no control over.
Funny thing is, people are buying Apple products because the alternative is Google, and why are you paying for Kagi, because you trust Google?
Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users
#356Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users
#357Earlier quoted context omitted.
Similarly, I had no idea about this feature, but I now know I want it... I think I just need it to be cheaper, maybe $5 unlimited (or enough for me, which I think is certainly higher than 300, probably higher than 1000, at least without behaviour change) and I'd be in I assume it's a bit chicken and egg - marginal costs of new customers/extra searches is relatively low, it's the crawling & development/SRE that's expe…
Defaulting to DuckDuckGo and using a bang for kagi when I don’t immediately get what I want would be nice. Unfortunately there isn’t one. I guess I could use an extension that lets me add personal ones.
I can't remember what for but I'm pretty sure I've used it and gotten a pretty fast approval.
Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users
#358Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users
#359Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interestingly not supported on Firefox Android. It's the first time I come across an add-on that doesn't work on both.
Firefox on Android only supports a handful of curated add-ons. You can apparently create your own collections or install anything with Firefox Nightly but I've not done this.
Re: Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users
#360Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's literally working code demos for everything on the site that's front-end or client-side.
Yes, and historically those code demos were often wrong in many important ways (like not working in all browsers, or insecure). They are much better now but reputation is hard to recover.