Live data from Hacker News

Rarbg Is No More

web.archive.org

351–360 of 679 posts

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Basically all of an actual software company is bullshit jobs unrelated to the core product like legal, marketing, investor relations, HR, maybe even developers for R&D etc. Running a website doesn't require that many people. I've worked at companies with 4 developers and 30+ "other stuff". The company would not be profitable and we would not get paid without them, but the actual product would work just fine if we wan…

> bullshit jobs unrelated to the core product like legal, marketing, investor relations, HR, maybe even developers for R&D etc. Wow. You think legal, marketing, investor relations are all bullshit jobs...? Just wow.

Peak HN moment

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#352
post #24

o7 thank you for your service, keeping the Internet awesome and anti-corporate. Where one piracy site dies, a thousand spawn from its corpse. Maybe the media companies will eventually pull their heads out of their collective arses and quit their cartel, allowing the existence of legal, paid streaming sites a-la-Spotify with access to 99% of the repertoire. Until then, torrent is how we protest while they create more…

I love when thieves act like they're such noble saints.

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anecdotally, I’ve never met anyone who thought this way who’s product didn’t suck.

I don't understand this. If you build a system for resilience, it should not take significant effort to maintain. You should be able to keep the lights on with 10-20% of the engineering team. The rest is growth. Growth may be making the product better, creating new product lines, or improving the scalability - for example, allowing larger numbers of users or entries. However, you can make the choice to make a well co…

> If you build a system for resilience, it should not take significant effort to maintain. You should be able to keep the lights on with 10-20% of the engineering team. The rest is growth.

After 10+ years you always see the operational demand increase because of all the necessary edge conditions you build up (backcompat and whatever else).

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#355

Really sad to hear this. I basically built my entire Plex server with RARBG. Anyone have any solid private tracker recommendations for movies and TV shows? After taking advantage of public trackers like RARBG, I feel like it's my time to give back.

[flagged]

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#357

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Basically all of an actual software company is bullshit jobs unrelated to the core product like legal, marketing, investor relations, HR, maybe even developers for R&D etc. Running a website doesn't require that many people. I've worked at companies with 4 developers and 30+ "other stuff". The company would not be profitable and we would not get paid without them, but the actual product would work just fine if we wan…

> bullshit jobs unrelated to the core product like legal, marketing, investor relations, HR, maybe even developers for R&D etc. Wow. You think legal, marketing, investor relations are all bullshit jobs...? Just wow.

[deleted]

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#358
post #326

Earlier quoted context omitted.

KickAssTorrents made millions of dollars a year in advertising revenue. I doubt their decision to start Rarbg was charitable or even ideologically driven. They probably just want out now. Lower margins may have been a part of that.

Can be both. Even Marx participated in the stock market

Of course he did! Marx was an economist, living within and studying capitalism. He wasn't some ascetic monk.

Re: Rarbg Is No More

#360
post #215

It's absolutely insane how many of these incredibly important torrent sites are just managed and hosted by a rag-tag group of people with the site barely clinging to life.

While we like to romanticize these groups, they often have ulterior motives in getting users to the site. Pushing ads from less-than-reputable ad-sources, and having a section with binaries where admins can push malware laden programs/games/files to increase the size of a client's botnet. The model is that as users become more comfortable on the site, they eventually browse to the more dangerous categories and downlo…

sorry but this is nonsensical, one site pushed malware so they all do? typical "security" person
Post reply on HN