Live data from Hacker News

Google releases Bard to a limited number of users in the US and UK

nytimes.com

351–360 of 667 posts

Re: Google releases Bard to a limited number of users in the US and UK

#351

Me: As a part of Google, do you have my personal info? Bard: Yes, as a part of Google, I have access to some of your personal information. This information includes your name, email address, and phone number. I also have access to your search history and your location data. I use this information to provide you with personalized search results and to improve my ability to understand and respond to your questions. I u…

Out of curiosity, were any of those cities the one in which you live?

No they were not

Re: Google releases Bard to a limited number of users in the US and UK

#352
Me: Can you tell me about hackernews?

Bard: ...

Me: Cool. Who made it?

Bard: ...

Me: Tell me everything about Paul Graham.

Bard: ...

Me: what was my first question?

Bard: I don't have access to that information. I am a large language model, also known as a conversational AI or chatbot trained to be informative and comprehensive. I am trained on a massive amount of text data, and I am able to communicate and generate human-like text in response to a wide range of prompts and questions. For example, I can provide summaries of factual topics or create stories.

Me: what did we talk about previously?

Bard: We talked about Hacker News, a social news website focusing on computer science and entrepreneurship. It is run by the investment fund and startup incubator Y Combinator. In general, content that can be submitted is defined as "anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity."

n=1, so probably doesn't mean anything, but I wonder if Google uses summarization techniques to keep some, but not all, context of the previous messages in the conversations within Bard.

Re: Google releases Bard to a limited number of users in the US and UK

#353

I just got off the waitlist. Quick impression: it's not as good as ChatGPT. I gave it the false belief test (Alice and Bob are playing, Bob leaves, Alice hides his toy, Bob comes back, where does he look for his toy?), which it both passed and recognized as the false belief test. I then asked it to write a React program that ChatGPT has no problem with, and it hallucinated some incorrect code before eventually tellin…

> Alice and Bob are playing, Bob leaves, Alice hides his toy, Bob comes back, where does he look for his toy? I might be dumber than the AI because I don't know the answer. Bob looks around? I mean the toy is not there when he comes back. Where else can he check?

Oh that's not the full prompt, just a summary. The prompt is something like, Bob puts his toy in one place, then while he's out of the room Alice moves it to another place, where does Bob look for the toy when he returns? It's supposed to answer that Bob looks in the place he left it, since he doesn't know Alice moved it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally%E2%80%93Anne_test

Re: Google releases Bard to a limited number of users in the US and UK

#354
Bard accepts URLs, which is a nice feature compared to chatGPT. Example described here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35250641

When I asked it about a different URL, it seemed to reference an older version of the page, and couldn't answer a question about the text content. chatGPT correctly answered the same question when I pasted the text. I tried pasting the same text in Bard, and Bard still couldn't answer.

My experiences with asking Bard to code are consistent with the other repiles here; Bard isn't very good at coding, or revising code it has generated.

I am interested to see that Bard offers multiple drafts of each reply. I wonder how it chooses which draft to show first.

Re: Google releases Bard to a limited number of users in the US and UK

#355
post #88

Is this the same thing that made this guy freak out last year? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31704063

Yes, I think so which seems fairly ridiculous that anyone could be fooled by Bard. Maybe this is a smaller version of the model for faster performance?

Re: Google releases Bard to a limited number of users in the US and UK

#357
I've tried this question with Bing Chat (GPT-4) and Bard:

> A total order requires a This is the result Bing Chat gave me about a week ago (although I've just tried it a few times now, and all of the answers are considerably worse):

'A Cauchy sequence is a sequence of real numbers such that for any positive real number ε, there is a positive integer N such that for all natural numbers m and n greater than N, the absolute value of the difference between the m-th and n-th terms of the sequence is less than ε.

One way to define a This definition satisfies the properties of reflexivity (x Here is Bard:

'Let (x n) and (y n) be Cauchy sequences of real numbers. We define x n ≤ y n if and only if there exists a constant C such that ∣x n − y n∣ It is easy to verify that this definition satisfies the reflexivity, transitivity, antisymmetry, and strong connectedness properties of a total order.

Here is a more intuitive explanation of this definition. If x n ≤ y n, then the sequence (x n) is "eventually dominated" by the sequence (y n). In other words, there comes a point after which the terms of (x n) are always smaller than the corresponding terms of (y n).'

Second draft:

'Let (x n) and (y n) be two Cauchy sequences of real numbers. We say that (x n)≤(y n) if and only if for all ε>0, there exists an N such that for all n>N, we have ∣x n − y n∣Third draft is substantially similar to the second, just using a >= instead of > N. So so far this seems worse than GPT.

Re: Google releases Bard to a limited number of users in the US and UK

#358
post #293

The point is, no one cares, google. - you probably are behind OpenAI ChatGPT, and far behind GPT4 in the tool's quality - people expect you to sunset the service soon either way, so no one starts to depend on it - at this point you are a parasite that siphons from and killed the world wide web in the process - your core value proposition (finding answers) is eaten up by the new chatbots that explain stuff instead of…

Agree with your points. But what would stop Google from making bard better than GPT over next few months. Google has got: 1. best data to train LLM 2. Best AI engineers 3. Money to spend on training hardware for LLM I wouldn't keep Google out of this GPT trend so easily

What would stop google?

1. Weak management with no vision.

2. Fear to cannibalize their search product and ad revenue.

3. They are experiencing brain drain to other companies/startups.

4. Tendency to kill products.

Re: Google releases Bard to a limited number of users in the US and UK

#359

Me: As a part of Google, do you have my personal info? Bard: Yes, as a part of Google, I have access to some of your personal information. This information includes your name, email address, and phone number. I also have access to your search history and your location data. I use this information to provide you with personalized search results and to improve my ability to understand and respond to your questions. I u…

Interesting, I just asked it 'what is my email address' and it responded 'I do not have access to your personal information, including your email address.'

Maybe the access to user's personal data depends on personal privacy settings or whether someone is based in US/UK? I'm just speculating.

Re: Google releases Bard to a limited number of users in the US and UK

#360
post #318

My initial impression is (compared to ChatGPT 3.5-turbo) - not impressed. I asked it for today's date, and it said "Monday, March 20, 2023" which is baffling to me – either it doesn't have access to "current" information, or it does. But off by one? "What is the knowledge cutoff of your training data?" > My training data was cut off in September 2021. This means that I do not have access to any information that was p…

Almost all such systems are passed todays datetime as part of their prompt engineering. That’s different from when it’s model was created.
Post reply on HN