Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What tech people like Paul Graham and others were hoping was for Elon to apply his scientific first principles type of thinking that he demonstrated previously at SpaceX+Tesla to Twitter. I wish one could take a step back and just see how ridiculous of a statement this is. There is nothing about Musk’s history and management style that is even remotely close to what could be called “scientific first principles type…
You mean the Paul Graham that was banned today from Twitter for "violating Twitter rules" ? https://twitter.com/nearcyan/status/1604598879973883905
Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll
351–360 of 757 posts
Re: Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll
#352Re: Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll
#353I think he only posts polls when he believes he knows the outcome already. Yesterday he posted a poll about unsuspending the journalist accounts and when the outcome wasn't what he wanted instead of following the majority vote he posted it again with different options (with the same result, which he did abide by the second time). I think this indicates he's tired of Twitter already. But he still owns it, so who will…
That is not what happened at all. In the first poll, he asked when the journalists should be unsuspended and the options were (a) now, (b) tomorrow, (c) in 7 days, and (d) longer. Choice (a) got 43%, not the majority. Choices (c) and (d) totaled 52.5%, which means the 𝗺𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 voted for a minimum suspension of 7 days. Elon then essentially invoked "rank choice" voting and ran a new poll with only the top two…
Plurality is not necessarily majority
Re: Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll
#354https://mobile.twitter.com/lexfridman/status/160462708738566...
Re: Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll
#355Earlier quoted context omitted.
Elon is not a savior because no one is purely a savior. He is a genius at hardware who badly needs to shut the fuck up and have people rein him in sometimes. Twitter has always been his weakness, and he needs to have emotional maturity and hire a new CEO, then stay off of it entirely for two weeks
> He is a genius I realize this is part of his narrative but I struggle to find the genius. As best i can tell he's a generally successful businessman.
Re: Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll
#356Re: Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll
#357Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't even think he's doing it on purpose, I think he's completely in over his head. Someone referred to Elon as "speedrunning being a forum moderator", or "running a Lowtax" and yeah, so far.
> The "this is a forum mod meltdown, at scale" joke keeps popping up because it's not a joke — it's recognizing a persistent pattern in bad governance of a mediated social space. https://twitter.com/eaton/status/1604632585849765889
Re: Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll
#358Earlier quoted context omitted.
My pet theory is that the cybertuck is just an excuse to start prototyping a future martian ground transport, in which case atmospheric drag may be less of a concern.
That’s an incredibly generous take. Why not just develop the thing instead of playing this “oh, we didn’t fail, we were just doing this other thing all along” game.
Re: Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll
#359Elon Musk posted "Vox Populi, Vox Dei" on 19 Oct and 19 Nov. Today is 19 Dec, and in 12 hours he'll post again that the people have spoken. He's playing some sort of game. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1582778449583693836 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1593769469741932544
Re: Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll
#360Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What tech people like Paul Graham and others were hoping was for Elon to apply his scientific first principles type of thinking that he demonstrated previously at SpaceX+Tesla to Twitter. I wish one could take a step back and just see how ridiculous of a statement this is. There is nothing about Musk’s history and management style that is even remotely close to what could be called “scientific first principles type…
Quoted post unavailable.