Come on with those optimizations. the internet is getting faster and I still see articles on how to optimize the website.
A 14kb page can load much faster than a 15kb page
351–356 of 356 posts
Re: A 14kb page can load much faster than a 15kb page
#352Earlier quoted context omitted.
75% of your download time is jQuery and webfonts. You'll need to review your own code to see if jQuery can be eliminated, but the fonts are probably an easier fix. You're serving them locally which is good, but changing to woff2 would help. Looks like you make a lot of use of the Gibsoni-Italic, so it's probably worth keeping. If it were only here or there, I'd say nix it and rely on font synthesis instead. If you're…
> If you're really dedicated, you could subset them to eliminate glyphs that you're not using on your website. They're pretty large fonts for just latin characters. This is really interesting, and would be pretty easy I think. I'll look into this.
I used this to not include an entire copy of font awesome: https://fontello.com/
Though if you're using vue3, I think tailwind or fontawesome will have better methods.
Re: A 14kb page can load much faster than a 15kb page
#353Earlier quoted context omitted.
> JPEG XL is intended for high quality images, so it is not optimized for this kind of extremely low bitrate (~0.1 bpp) usage. It's better than AVIF at low bitrates. I did a comparison of the latest builds 3 months ago, and was amazed that JPEG XL has more detail than AVIF at 0.05-0.1 bpp (~120KB 1080p). It's a bit subtle, but I could see it. Once browsers ship full support (at least Firefox + Chrome), I'll be on boa…
> and was amazed that JPEG XL has more detail than AVIF at 0.05-0.1 bpp (~120KB 1080p) bpp = bits per pixel, not bytes. At 1080p, "0.05-0.1 bpp" is 13-26 KB. Much smaller than what you were testing. Might want to recheck your sizes, if you are actually looking at 0.5 bpp it would not surprise me at all that you found JPEG XL superior. At very small sizes like 0.1 bpp the results are debatable, but I think AVIF is a p…
In the experimental Document-Policy HTTP header, "bpp" does seem to signify bytes per pixel.
Document-Policy explainer: https://github.com/wicg/document-policy/blob/main/document-p...
I tried it out on my own site, and through trial-and-error I found that Chromium does in fact treat the "max-bpp" Document-Policy directives as bytes-per-pixel.
I could be wrong; my memory has faded. Please correct me if this is the case.
Re: A 14kb page can load much faster than a 15kb page
#354Earlier quoted context omitted.
We sell fine food (bowtieduck.com ). Saw you are from Cebu we just opened deliveries there ;) and yes web hosting is weird and super expensive here.
Nice site. I am also in a similar position, now rewriting our website to make it modern and fast. Like your site that its snappy, but found something odd. Delivery in 78 years [1,2] [1] https://bowtieduck.com/traditional/kurimu-x-the-bow-tie-duck... [2] https://ibb.co/W5B50d8
Sorry for that. The product was in between states ( not yet restocked but no more on preorder ) :)
Re: A 14kb page can load much faster than a 15kb page
#355Earlier quoted context omitted.
> and was amazed that JPEG XL has more detail than AVIF at 0.05-0.1 bpp (~120KB 1080p) bpp = bits per pixel, not bytes. At 1080p, "0.05-0.1 bpp" is 13-26 KB. Much smaller than what you were testing. Might want to recheck your sizes, if you are actually looking at 0.5 bpp it would not surprise me at all that you found JPEG XL superior. At very small sizes like 0.1 bpp the results are debatable, but I think AVIF is a p…
In the experimental Document-Policy HTTP header, "bpp" does seem to signify bytes per pixel. Document-Policy explainer: https://github.com/wicg/document-policy/blob/main/document-p... I tried it out on my own site, and through trial-and-error I found that Chromium does in fact treat the "max-bpp" Document-Policy directives as bytes-per-pixel. I could be wrong; my memory has faded. Please correct me if this is the cas…
I'm not sure what HTTP headers have to do with anything. Using "bpp" to mean bits per pixel is extremely common in image encoding. See e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_depth where an uncompressed image is often 24 bpp (8 bits per channel). It's also common to use bitrate (rather than byterate) in audio encoding, see e.g. https://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Bitrate
Re: A 14kb page can load much faster than a 15kb page
#356I read it. This is new to me, and I guess one needs to remove so many tags and tracking tools. I hope it only counts to a single server. What happens with the data loaded from CDNs?