Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I've come to believe flipping is a major problem, at least in my locale. A $300K house gets $50K of "improvements", then the investors needs $100K profit after commissions are covered and so we're in the $500K range for the next buyer and very little value was added. That's not quite how it works though. How much the investor spent in changes is not relevant. What matters is how much the next buyer values those cha…
> What matters is how much the next buyer values those changes. Flipping doesn't really exist when appreciation is low. Remember how no one was flipping houses in 2010? And then in 2012, suddenly everyone in their mom started flipping houses again? It only makes sense when asset appreciation is high. You'll find that most of the "value added" is simply them holding the house for 6 months and capturing appreciation (o…
In my opinion, the "value added" is more correlated with what new construction on the similar land would cost. As lumber prices went up last year, existing homes went up too because the cost of building became higher. Essentially, a flipper wants you to feel like you have a new home at a discount and you'll pay the optimal amount for it.