Live data from Hacker News

On Trouser Pockets

sambleckley.com

351–360 of 400 posts

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#351
TFA notes that people take their phones out of pockets. I believe the real reason for that is phones are now so large that they are uncomfortable to have in any pocket while sitting.

Also, idk - if your pants are so tight that you can't make use of the pockets you are definitely risking a Tom Brady moment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAMUArVQtks

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#352
post #295
post #218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I recall clicking a Duluth Trading link from a thread not so unlike this on HN years ago and then being followed by ads for their jeans across the internet for at least a year. Of course, I remember that just after clicking your link.

Probably google ads. You can click the little x in the corner and make that particular ad go away.

Lucky you people: I've been followed around the web for over ten years with Google ads for scammy dating sites (since Zoosk if anyone can remember that).

When I click the x I only get another scammy dating site.

And unlike GP I cannot remember visiting one in the first place :-/

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#353
post #2

>"Appendix: Sam, have you simply invented cargo pants? >No. Cargo pants are fashion-as-pretend-occupation — when not at work, wear a fancy chronometer to suggest you’re a pilot or a diver, or camo to suggest you’re in the military. Cargo pants are a paratrooper costume. Cargo shorts have giant external pouches so teenagers in the 90’s, trapped in school, could say (sartorially) “I go out into the world and do adventu…

Yeah, I felt somewhat slandered by the attack on cargo pants. I wore them in high school and still wear them to this day for comfort and convenience. There is a functional elegance of being able to have pens, a small note book, keys+wallet and phone in separate pockets easily accessible. It's like having a preponderance of tabs open, but for pants.

Totally agree.

Nothing makes me more upset than needing a pad and paper at a moment's notice, but having to reach into a backpack or a messenger bag instead. That feeling of dread when you realize the moment has passed, the thought is gone forever, and if I had only had quick access to my pen and pad, I would have saved a potentially enormously lucrative idea. But the extra 5 seconds to take the paper and pen out of my backpack the one time every year I need to write something down on the go cost me dearly. Now, I optimize for that rare situation. Sure, I look like a 15 year old manchild who never learned to properly dress himself, but that's fine, I work in tech, and don't need to interact with non tech people who have preconceived notions about me.

And don't even get me started on regular pants pockets for your phone or wallet or keys. Sure they fit securely, are easy to access, and are universal, but they're not functionally elegant cargo pockets.

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#355

The dismissiveness in this thread is unreal. From the comments you'd think the article only had one sentence insulting the Sanctity of Cargo Pants. If you happily wear baggy jeans or cargo pants, these are not for you and you don't have the problem they solve. It's an elegant solution to wear slim fitted pants without awful hip pocket bulges. Cargo pants are not the solution here, as they are huge and baggy and the p…

Still doesn't seem super different, personally. Women seem to already have cargo options that aren't like you say: http://becomechic.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/20-Ways-To-... https://www.memorandum.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/i-ivor...

And there's some men's one out there similar: https://www.hugoboss.com/us/relaxed-fit-cargo-pants-in-itali... https://www.wearfigs.com/pages/shop-products/mens-axim-cargo...

Although as a programmer, no one would bat an eye if I wore shorts to work, even, so I find the author's claims that cargos can't be worn to an office kind of outdated. Maybe he's a car salesman or something and his boss forces his to wear a suit.

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#356
post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So not wanting to wear cargo pants because I think they look like shit makes me classiest and racist? This kind of behavior where people are labeling anything and everything racist is very much harmful, and makes every sensible people less sensitive to racist claims.

No, saying cargo pants are ugly because they look like what a laborer (or a "pretend-laborer" to use the article's wording) wears is classist.

I disagree, cargo pants were a fashion choice eschewed by most "laborers" at the time because they were made out of materials that wouldn't stand up to heavy use.

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#357

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like a built in fanny pack?

Yeah! They're popular despite being universally derided. If someone can solve that style problem, I smell disruption. There is a running "flip belt" that is also essentially the same thing. I haven't pulled the trigger, but it remains on my mind.

There are a quite a few of these running belts, none of which have solved the style problem to my taste unfortunately. I was researching these extensively for running last week, so without endorsing any specifically, here are some names I've heard a lot in running and hiking communities online in case it helps anyone looking at options:

* FlipBelt

* Naked Running Band

* SPIbelt

* Salomon Pulse

Also, a comparison review of a bunch of different models: https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-running-belt...

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#358

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That sounds like a problem with the obnoxiously large phones as well :p

Sadly the large phone thing seems here to stay, and it’s driving out small phone options :(

I get Pixel phones to get stock Android and reliable updates and the smallest I can get are ~6 inch phones. If a 5 inch Pixel was released I'd buy it in a heartbeat

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#359

The dismissiveness in this thread is unreal. From the comments you'd think the article only had one sentence insulting the Sanctity of Cargo Pants. If you happily wear baggy jeans or cargo pants, these are not for you and you don't have the problem they solve. It's an elegant solution to wear slim fitted pants without awful hip pocket bulges. Cargo pants are not the solution here, as they are huge and baggy and the p…

>Cargo pants are not the solution here, as they are huge and baggy and the pockets flop around with anything in them. You're getting the wrong pants if that's the case. For a time now, I've been buying work pants almost exclusively. Not the cargo pants with flappy hip pockets, but the lighter duty work pants or "service pants", though I'm not 100% sure of the correct english word for them. They're work pants, but not…

Is this the one?

https://www.blaklader.com/en/product/16251370-blaklader-work...

Re: On Trouser Pockets

#360

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The second answer is that if you dress for aesthetic instead of functional reasons, one of the very first concerns is silhouette. See, I think you've missed what everyone in this thread is trying to get at. The defense of cargo pants is based on a pretty simple dialectic: · Who determines what is fashionable or "aesthetic"? Mostly, the people who design, sell, and advertise clothes. And also, people who directly pr…

I really struggle to believe that there’s some secret cabal of garment manufacturers conspiring to decide what modifications of their clothes will be desirable in the next season. One reason is that the industry is competitive and mostly full of low margins. If you collude with (some of) your competitors to sell the same thing then your market becomes both smaller and more competitive. Another is that fashion changes…

"Determine" isn't synonymous with "dictate". No cabalistic intrigue required.
Post reply on HN