Live data from Hacker News

Google bans Zoom from employees' computers

buzzfeednews.com

351–360 of 450 posts

Re: Google bans Zoom from employees' computers

#351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We switched from google hangouts to zoom a while ago because the quality "felt" better. We are a small distributed team where our internet connections run the range of fast to slow. We didn't track numbers or anything, but fewer dropouts, frozen videos, better sound quality, etc. Maybe we all just had better internet days each time we used zoom though. Never know. The UI is initially confusing, but so is the UI for e…

Zoom is better at quality. To give an example, they prioritize audio over anything else. Which makes sense because if you can't understand what the person is saying, you can't have a meeting. So they automatically downgrade or upgrade your video to try to keep latency decent on audio. Meet just has a manual setting where you can up or downgrade video or audio.

For the most part my understanding is that zoom is better at quality because it does not use webrtc - but hangout meet does. This means webrtc needs a lot of the fixing, which is hard because it's a standard.

zoom sends proprietary stuff over web sockets instead. Which is also why they prefer you use their fat clients with native decoding

Re: Google bans Zoom from employees' computers

#352
post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use this because I have a pixelbook and it works pretty well except for two issues: (1) minor issue that you have to click the "leave meeting" button, you can't just close the window or else it strangely relaunches and (2) major issue is that you can't change your video background which is a killer feature IMO.

I haven't been able to find a way to change my video background on the Linux client either. The image recognition software must be difficult to reliably implement for their lower-value platforms (as in, it would cost them too much to get it working well relative to the number of users).

You have to be signed in to use it.

Re: Google bans Zoom from employees' computers

#353

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, but why does it matter if China intercepts your American school children? Why would they want to? That's not a reasonable threat model.

It still leaks information. How many kids you have, their name, some things about their personality, who they are friends with, etc. Think about how someone who wants to hurt or control you could could use that information.

I couldn't imagine it mattering to any random individual, but I could imagine some American diplomat or defense contractor being concerned.

Re: Google bans Zoom from employees' computers

#354
post #338

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I haven't once thought, "Gee, I really wish I could use Microsoft Word". I have thought, "there's a capability I wish I had in Docs" a few times. I did most of my doc writing in LyX before Google, though.

I imagine most people who want MS Office over Google Docs probably want it for Excel, which IIUC as several powerful features not present in Google's Sheets.

The only thing Google Docs has over MS is the collaboration.

Word in the browser is a billion times better for formatting than Google Docs. I loath using google docs. But when it comes to Collab, Google docs wins hands down.

Re: Google bans Zoom from employees' computers

#355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One thing that puts me off about Zoom is the way it tries to push you into downloading the desktop app when the web app should be fine and is what I prefer. It uses shitty dark patterns that require two or three clicks and at one point, if I'm not mistaken, waiting for a link to appear after a delay. In my most recent experience with it, it led to a zip file being automatically downloaded to my computer. This when I…

> One thing that puts me off about Zoom is the way it tries to push you into downloading the desktop app when the web app should be fine and is what I prefer. I'm pretty sure they do that because their web app is garbage, and they know people will get a much better experience in the native app. Notably, Zoom's native app is truly native; it's not some electron wrapper like Slack or Teams. I don't think it's a coincid…

> and they know people will get a much better experience in the native app.

not if I'm a user who is actively trying to not install the native app. for me, and likely many others, security and privacy trump performance benchmarks and UI/UX all day, every day.

Re: Google bans Zoom from employees' computers

#356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On a 1:1 video call. There a dozens of good tools for that - show me a good webrtc app that can handle a 50 user video call well. Or even 10-15 users.

WebRTC fell down for 6 users the other day, so we switched to G2M

GoToMeeting is the WORST!

They have this long long outstanding bug where if they deem the audio low-quality (despite the fact it's crystal clear) they gain the audio and it goes crackly and too loud. If you turn down the volume... they gain it again, and again, and again, till you need to restart the app. Only for it to happen again.

Re: Google bans Zoom from employees' computers

#357
post #83

Some thoughts: 1. Google's threat model may not be your threat model, and it definitely isn't the threat model of my daughter's school. A corporation like Google may be concerned using native applications, written in unsafe languages, written by developers from other corporations in China. That said, Zoom isn't wrong for everyone. 2. Google is motivated to push their own solution for obvious reasons. 3. Tavis, or oth…

With the kind of things we are seeing with Zoom, I shudder at what Tavis & team will find.

Re: Google bans Zoom from employees' computers

#358
post #83

Some thoughts: 1. Google's threat model may not be your threat model, and it definitely isn't the threat model of my daughter's school. A corporation like Google may be concerned using native applications, written in unsafe languages, written by developers from other corporations in China. That said, Zoom isn't wrong for everyone. 2. Google is motivated to push their own solution for obvious reasons. 3. Tavis, or oth…

Or perhaps Google just doesn't like China.

Re: Google bans Zoom from employees' computers

#359
post #338

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I imagine most people who want MS Office over Google Docs probably want it for Excel, which IIUC as several powerful features not present in Google's Sheets.

The only thing Google Docs has over MS is the collaboration. Word in the browser is a billion times better for formatting than Google Docs. I loath using google docs. But when it comes to Collab, Google docs wins hands down.

> The only thing Google Docs has over MS is the collaboration.

As someone who has had to build relatively complex tools in both Sheets and Excel, I would have to say Sheets has done a much more impressive job with their builtin formulas/functions than Excel.

Re: Google bans Zoom from employees' computers

#360
post #333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We switched from google hangouts to zoom a while ago because the quality "felt" better. We are a small distributed team where our internet connections run the range of fast to slow. We didn't track numbers or anything, but fewer dropouts, frozen videos, better sound quality, etc. Maybe we all just had better internet days each time we used zoom though. Never know. The UI is initially confusing, but so is the UI for e…

When you say hangouts, do you mean old hangouts or the newer Hangouts Meet? They are 2 very different products.

When we used it they still called it hangouts.
Post reply on HN