Live data from Hacker News

WeWork Gets a Visit from Financial Reality

bloomberg.com

351–360 of 380 posts

Re: WeWork Gets a Visit from Financial Reality

#351
post #176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We: Also, We won't let We eat meat. ( https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-13/wework-te... ) Me: But I like meat! We: Not if you want to be We, you don't. Are you sure you're We material?

Seriously, the day my employer bans meat is the day I walk out, right after ordering a side of beef delivered to the CEOs office.

Aka, the company wants to take a moral stand for once and I am going to retailate with an immoral posturing and kill some innocent animals and shove my immoral views in their face, before i leave.

Re: WeWork Gets a Visit from Financial Reality

#352
post #93

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-08/wework... "In addition to the corporate finance weirdness: “Going forward, the company will no longer be called WeWork but rather The We Company.” (“The switch is not a legal name change,” okay.) And: “Rather than just renting desks, the company aims to encompass all aspects of people’s lives, in both physical and digital worlds,” which is—and I have spent years w…

> WeDie

I wonder when craft-dying becomes popular.

Re: WeWork Gets a Visit from Financial Reality

#353
post #176
post #93

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-08/wework... "In addition to the corporate finance weirdness: “Going forward, the company will no longer be called WeWork but rather The We Company.” (“The switch is not a legal name change,” okay.) And: “Rather than just renting desks, the company aims to encompass all aspects of people’s lives, in both physical and digital worlds,” which is—and I have spent years w…

We: Also, We won't let We eat meat. ( https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-13/wework-te... ) Me: But I like meat! We: Not if you want to be We, you don't. Are you sure you're We material?

That's actually a good policy though, because meat is bad

Re: WeWork Gets a Visit from Financial Reality

#354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I strongly disagree. I have had many Uber rides where I wished it took longer to get to my destination. The driver engaged in fantastic conversation. I learned from them, I got insight into the area and recommendations. Self driving seems sterile.

Although, they probably wanted it to end so they could make more money on another fare.

Understandable, I was just referring to the enjoyable experience of the ride and nice conversation. It sure as hell beats a cab any day.

Re: WeWork Gets a Visit from Financial Reality

#355
post #52
post #3

Crazy valuations for startups like WeWork remind me of the Dot Com bubble, when companies put up a shiny new "high tech" facade in front of entirely traditional business models, then expected to be valued at a large multiple of a normal company with that well trodden value proposition. We all know how well that ended. Companies that want the sky-high valuations of innovative high tech should be, you know, actually in…

Anything pitched as 'tech' that doesn't look or smell like 'tech' is basically the founders' way of saying 'we need a lot of money because we lose millions each year and are nowhere close to making a profit.'

Well, maybe they should add Blockchain to the company name.

Re: WeWork Gets a Visit from Financial Reality

#357
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Tech allows a company like Uber to allocate rides vastly more efficiently It's more accurate to say that venture capital allows Uber to subsidize rides more aggressively. I see no evidence that Uber is substantially more efficient (when you include the driver's costs) than traditional taxi companies. Edit: Uber has also managed to skirt a bunch of labor laws by claiming their employees are contractors. I guess that…

I think it's unquestionable that tech like Uber's can/does allocate cars and rides more efficiently. The taxi model relies on drivers circling looking for a fare and phone dispatch with, at best, a dispatcher seeing GPS cab location on a screen and trying to eyeball-match it to the caller's location. (or, at worst, caller-reported location, and radioing a bunch of cabs asking them "hey, where you at?") At its most ef…

> At its most efficient, an Uber model can automatically and predictively allocate rides based on realtime rider and driver current and predicted locations with realtime traffic/travel data. [emphasis mine]

This seems like a bizarre claim. Precisely when a specific rider will call for an Uber is inherently unpredictable (at least without a lot of surveillance). Meanwhile Uber drivers are not paid to drive from place to place without a rider - so Uber has limited capability to make them do something like head to a high-volume area in anticipation of demand. This is especially true since almost all drivers I talk to now drive for Uber, Lyft, and whoever else at the same time.

The micro-optimizations of dispatching drivers based on what side of the street I'm on or how many left vs. right turns are on the route are nice but only have a meaningful impact on wait time when there are already numerous drivers in the area to choose from (i.e. when the wait time is already short).

Edit: On second glance I realized you may mean that the dispatch is predictive in terms of anticipating traffic conditions and factoring this into the matchmaking between riders and drivers. While this is valuable, the key innovation here is the same kind of predictive routing algorithms that both Google and Apple already provide. Building this yourself may be hard, but is far from novel.

Re: WeWork Gets a Visit from Financial Reality

#358
post #288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

re: NES That was a console released following the video game industry crash of 1983 — a crash associated with total pessimism of games everywhere (at least in the US, but that was the most important console market) It’s likely they were very deliberately trying avoid direct association with the game industry. Afaik, they’ve always intended their consoles be percieved as more toy-like, but the nes was a particilarly h…

They're not the "serious" console. But you can't cash serious at the bank. Being everybody's second or third choice has made Nintendo hand over fist the past couple years.

Exactly.

For most of my gaming type friends, it's always a battle of MS vs Sony every single console cycle. However, after a few months of playing the main console, they almost always buy a Nintendo console as their secondary.

I don't think Nintendo minds being "third" place as long as the first and second place customers still buy their system. I know I would be happy in Nintendo's shoes.

Re: WeWork Gets a Visit from Financial Reality

#359
post #336

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just curious, what kind of company do the EEs work for if not tech?

Just guessing, but probably traditional electrical engineers. Like designing the power system for a restaurant buildout or whatever.

Exactly this. The fellow in the desk right next to me is doing the power/lighting work for a new restaurant going in in my apartment building - which is how I found out that’s what he does, when I ran into him outside my building entrance.

Re: WeWork Gets a Visit from Financial Reality

#360

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Only Nope. Never in my life heard of it being a britishism. Edit: A downvote for proving an absolute statement wrong? "Bloody" is used as a britishism. "Wee" is not, at least in many areas.

Have lived all over the US, "wee" is most definitely used.

As a Britishism? I didn't say it wasn't used at all.
Post reply on HN