Live data from Hacker News

European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitrust case

europa.eu

351–360 of 975 posts

Re: European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitrust case

#351
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A monopoly is not defined by the possiblity that there are other products available for purchase on the market, but rather how many products have been purchased and are in use. Using your reasoning, Microsoft could never have had a monopoly on Windows because you always could have bought a Mac.

That latter definition is in fact a reasonable counter-argument to Windows being a monopoly (people did buy Macs), and that's why Microsoft got in trouble for the deals they cut to try and crush Netscape, not for making a more popular OS than Apple did. You can't define a monopoly as "your competitors aren't popular" because otherwise it'd be illegal to invent new product categories, as at the start you'd be the only…

FWIW the definition of a patent is a "time-limited monopoly on working an invention", so all new products that are patented are monopolies by definition.

As the sibling comment rightly says, monopolies are acceptable. But, as the EU clearly point out, a greater onus is put on monopolies to avoid abusing their monopoly power.

Re: European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitrust case

#352
The European law that was used to fine Google is old and Google was warned since many years ago Microsoft was fined because it used its powers to force Internet Explorer to be the only pre-installed browser on Windows. It seems that Google knowingly broke the law.

Re: European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitrust case

#353

Site is under maintanance, Google Cache link (hahaha): http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:europa.... //edit: oh, took only a minute or two :) nice work I really like this point: > [Google] has prevented manufacturers wishing to pre-install Google apps from selling even a single smart mobile device running on alternative versions of Android that were not approved by Google (so-called "Android forks")…

I agree, if dropped, this will motivate big electronics players to release smart phones powered by android that aren't Google infested. Sometimes when I'm in a cynical mood, I feel like my android phone isn't really mine, it's owned by google and exists purely to serve them. This would improve the smartphone market on so many levels. We need a great driver support for AOSP, multiple app stores, community driven updat…

>Sometimes when I'm in a cynical mood, I feel like my android phone isn't really mine, it's owned by google and exists purely to serve them.

But this is objectively true, else why would Google spend so much money developing an OS to release for free?

Re: European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitrust case

#354

This is a dangerous ruling that pushes the world further into the potential for trade wars by proxy. Contrary to numerous posts- -no, the law isn't "clear". This is an incredibly nuanced situation, and the notion that Google was just overtly flouting (ed: thx sjcsjc) the law is outright nonsense. Google has a huge litany of bad practices (I personally recently switched my daily driver to an iPhone for that reason), b…

What Google was doing was extremely similar to what got Microsoft in trouble for bundling Internet Explorer and Windows Media Player back in the day, and there have been rumblings that the EU was looking at them for it for years. I don't know how you could argue this is a surprise.

Re: European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitrust case

#355
post #290

This is a dangerous ruling that pushes the world further into the potential for trade wars by proxy. Contrary to numerous posts- -no, the law isn't "clear". This is an incredibly nuanced situation, and the notion that Google was just overtly flouting (ed: thx sjcsjc) the law is outright nonsense. Google has a huge litany of bad practices (I personally recently switched my daily driver to an iPhone for that reason), b…

> is going to ring across all multinationals as a warning I'm not sure how that's a bad thing.

[dead]

Re: European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitrust case

#356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, Apple is a brutal dictatorship that doesn't share anything? That's fine. Oh, Google, you're willing to share almost everything with anyone for free, but you want to put terms on that? Hey, here's a giant fine. I just don't understand the logic of this at all.

The logic is that you're not allowed to use your position in one marked to gain influence in another. Google knows that most manufacturer needs their devices to ship with the Play Store, because that's where the apps are and smartphone without apps are useless. But they use the Play Store as leverage, forcing manufactures to also ship Chrome, rather than Opera, Firefox or their own browser and that's the bit that is…

Name an industry that doesn't use their position in one market to gain influence in another.

Re: European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitrust case

#357

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, I'm not alleging Apple was passive here, at all I'm saying that when you get a deal this good — however you ended up there — you should not be surprised when it turns out that it was illegal. Of course Apple shopped around. But if somebody offered to sell you $20 bills for half a cent each, would you suspect something dodgy? That's the scale of the issue here.

Apple should be forced to pay back 10x what they gained in this illegal deal. It's bleedingly obvious that it's illegal to be taxed differently than other companies. Paying back €13bn is nothing. Companies that "make deals" on tax anywhere in the world should be effectively banned from the EU market. It's pure evil. Or pay 10x of any gain they have made anywhere in the world by "making deals" on tax, thereby undercut…

It's bleedin' blindingly obvious that this is all a matter of corporate strategy. Yeah they should be fined for sure, but as many are keen to point out they keep to the letter of the law. That's not to say the EC couldn't enact some kind of retroactive legislation but that wouldn't be likely as they have their own "special interests" to look after too ...

Re: European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitrust case

#358
post #215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On what data do you base your judgement that GDPR means the EU "hands out fines like candy"?

The article this post links to would point to the trigger happy fine nature of the EU when it comes to American technology

A years-long investigation into a mega-corp is "trigger-happy" and cause for worry?

Re: European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitrust case

#359

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because they don't control the devices of 87% of users. Their profits are good for them and all, but have no direct bearing on their ability to exert unfair influence, especially in other markets (e.g. search engines).

They have plenty of influence for developers, which means they have influence for consumers. They have a huge say in what apps and websites get built and how because everybody has to play by their rules to get on their lucrative platform. Do you think you could launch a successful search engine today that wasn't available on iOS? Take Safari as a case in point. Apple doesn't allow other browsers on their platform whi…

Marketshare is marketshare and the numbers are clear. Yes, Apple is more influential than its marketshare indicates, but that is hard to quantify (especially legally) and in any case probably not as large an effect as you think.

Re: European Commission fines Google €4.34B in Android antitrust case

#360

This is a dangerous ruling that pushes the world further into the potential for trade wars by proxy. Contrary to numerous posts- -no, the law isn't "clear". This is an incredibly nuanced situation, and the notion that Google was just overtly flouting (ed: thx sjcsjc) the law is outright nonsense. Google has a huge litany of bad practices (I personally recently switched my daily driver to an iPhone for that reason), b…

>"well it's only a quarter's earnings across all of Google"

actually, 2017 google made $110B so its not 1/4 but 1/22 of their profits last year.. enormous? meh.

Post reply on HN