Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The frustrating part about solar is that because the peak generation output doesn't line up with typical peak consumption ("the duck curve"), utilities need natgas peakers, which sit mostly idle, to fill in the gap. Solar does line up with peak consumption. The duck curve is not a consumption curve, but a "Net Demand" curve -- the demand remaining after solar and generation is removed. Peakers existed before solar.…
> Solar does line up with peak consumption. Not true according to [1], which shows peak consumption around 19:00, just as solar production drops to 0. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_curve
Solar Just Hit a Record Low Price in the U.S
351–352 of 352 posts
Re: Solar Just Hit a Record Low Price in the U.S
#352Earlier quoted context omitted.
From some externality to society perspective, sure. But that's definitely not true of a grid operation cost perspective. A coal power plant does not get paid retail rates for the power it generates. The utility company charges more precisely to pay for transmission and the people to maintain it.
Ok, so what? Let's punish the free riders and reward the people who are reducing the total societial cost of energy. The fact that solar owners get access to the energy grid for free seems like a clever way to punish the free riders by increasing their costs in a roundabout way. Don't want to pay the higher costs for your power grid? Then upgrade to cleaner energy! Sounds great.
The companies that operate grids are not the free riders. By having idiotic legislation that allows solar owners to free ride the grid, you only punished the utility company. Sometimes they own power plants, sometimes they don't.