Live data from Hacker News

The Myers-Briggs Personality Test Is Pretty Much Meaningless

smithsonianmag.com

351–352 of 352 posts

Re: The Myers-Briggs Personality Test Is Pretty Much Meaningless

#351
post #346

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, it is not data-mining bias. There really is a correlation. It is real, but realizing that has no usefulness at all.

The correlation with pirates is real too, that's my point, correlations don't mean anything. Only causation is meaningful. The only use of a correlation is as a starting point for finding causation.

Actually... I think causation may largely be a red herring as well. Our most successful models really do not incorporate it at all. They are in the form of F=ma or PV=nRT. There is no causality there.

Re: The Myers-Briggs Personality Test Is Pretty Much Meaningless

#352
post #351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The correlation with pirates is real too, that's my point, correlations don't mean anything. Only causation is meaningful. The only use of a correlation is as a starting point for finding causation.

Actually... I think causation may largely be a red herring as well. Our most successful models really do not incorporate it at all. They are in the form of F=ma or PV=nRT. There is no causality there.

Models are final solutions; causation is how you end up finding those final solutions: causation is understanding, it's vitally important.
Post reply on HN