So GLM 5.2/Gemini 3.6 level intelligence for $0.28/m output. And their updated Pro model coming soon.... Plus a size you can genuinely run at home: Unsloth lossless Q8 at 162GB.
I would like to see your "home"
[dead]
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis
341–343 of 343 posts
Re: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis
#342Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Anthropic and OpenAI models are much more censored and in ways that directly prevent them to be useful, e.g. by refusing to reply to elementary questions of biology and chemistry. Any normal user is much more likely to ask questions to which the Anthropic and OpenAI models do not answer, than to ask questions about the modern Chinese history, to which a Chinese LLM will not answer.
I actually cancelled my max plan for Claude today due to this silliness. I can’t get Fable to answer a single question, even pure mathematical questions that have no bio/chem references. It was a totally worthless addition to my account…
Do you have examples we could try?
Re: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Intelligence, Performance and Price Analysis
#343Already beat Luna on price/task, by about 2x: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/deepseek-v4-flash?intel...
Maybe I'm reading that incorrectly, but it seems to me the cost is on the X-axis. First, your direct comparison, Deepseek V4 Flash 0731 (max effort) $0.03 (rounded up) per task @ index 50. OpenAI Luna: * high effort $0.03 (rounded down) @ index 46 * xhigh effort $0.04 @ index 49 * max effort $0.07 @ index 51 So I would say a fair statement would be "OpenAI Luna between 2x and 3x the price of Deepseek Flash, what you…
[dead]