Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know what to tell you. You're restating the paradox of tolerance. You should probably come to some philosophical resolution regarding that before you keep digging.
What I have said has nothing to do with the paradox of tolerance. I am firmly on the side of not tolerating the intolerant, but stating that, "not tolerating" does not extend to "starting wars in an attempt at world conquest to rid the world of the intolerant".
Hormuz Minesweeper – Are you tired of winning?
341–350 of 507 posts
Re: Hormuz Minesweeper – Are you tired of winning?
#342Re: Hormuz Minesweeper – Are you tired of winning?
#343Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are both very bad guys.
"good people on both sides"
So what exactly is the problem with saying both bombing school children and machine gunning protestors is bad? Be specific.
Re: Hormuz Minesweeper – Are you tired of winning?
#344Re: Hormuz Minesweeper – Are you tired of winning?
#345[flagged]
Behind the scenes help is perfectly ok. The colonists didn’t form America entirely on their own.
I think where so many have issue with this war is that a couple of old men decided they would try to overthrow an incredibly dug in regime with a little air power. It’s like Iraq and Afghanistan all over again. The results are wildly predictable.
The regime is entrenched and waiting it out while causing havoc with semi-guerilla tactics of bullying the Straits and attacking neighbors.
Change comes from within. Not from cruise missiles.
Re: Hormuz Minesweeper – Are you tired of winning?
#346[flagged]
Re: Hormuz Minesweeper – Are you tired of winning?
#347[flagged]
Re: Hormuz Minesweeper – Are you tired of winning?
#348[flagged]
Re: Hormuz Minesweeper – Are you tired of winning?
#349Re: Hormuz Minesweeper – Are you tired of winning?
#350Earlier quoted context omitted.
Turns out consistency is overrated. We talk as if it's a bare minimum, but there isn't actually any penalty for violating it. We've still got some kind of karmic notion that inconsistency is bad for you in the long run. Maybe it is, but that run keeps getting longer and longer.
Having contact with reality is quite important when critical moments arise. Fantasy can proper you quite high, but there is a breaking point where it can't carry the day. Trump & Co are both post-truth and detached for reality. I am a bit scared for your country when you get a post-truth populist that is NOT detached from reality. If you can't deal with a buffoon like Trump, how will you be able to deal with someone…
That wouldn't be possible if he were any smarter. Nor is he a Boris Johnson type character, playing the clown while being quite well educated in private.
The right wing coalition will survive and thrive even without him. But it's hard to predict just how, because it will have to adapt.