Live data from Hacker News

The whole thing was a scam

garymarcus.substack.com

341–347 of 347 posts

Re: The whole thing was a scam

#341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

wow. you're comparing EU: crimes happened, were exposed, people suffered consequences, with USA: no criminal suffered anything, president joining on a genocide for real state deals bribe, etc. kinda a stretch, don't you think?

How many people have suffered consequences anyway? Epstein ran a large sex abuse network and and even larger corruption network. How many people have been sentenced so far? How many are even being investigated? While most of the network in in the US, there are very many highly placed people in Europe who will have been involved, and so far only a few have suffered. One Norwegian charged, two in the UK under investiga…

Next to no-one has been charged since Epstein was arrested by the US and they memory-holed his files until a few months ago. There weren't anything to base an investigation on until very recently.

Re: The whole thing was a scam

#342

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hunter Thompson? Not saying he wouldn't have banged on the button, for all he was worth, but no one in their right (or even severely sick) mind would ever let him near it.

Looks like he's referring to Harry S. Truman. Probably doesn't know who Thompson was. I'll never forget Thompson speaking at my school as the war in Vietnam was drawing to a close. He did not mince words.

For the benefit of any others unfamiliar:

Thompson: The man who invented gonzo journalism, writing beginning in the 1950s for numerous publications but most notably Rolling Stone, best known for Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, serialised in RS, published as a book, and the basis of two films, Where the Buffalo Roam (loose adaptation, 1980) and more faithfully in 1998 under the original name, starring Johnny Depp and Benicio del Toro.

Re: The whole thing was a scam

#343

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It feels like everyone is desperate to hate on Sam all the time. He’s made his mistakes but it feels way beyond what’s called for. There is this constant boogeyman narrative with him I find very disingenuous

If he keeps surrounding himself with sketchy people, people will look at him as a sketchy person. It’s not because he’s Sam Altman; it’s because of the people he surrounds himself with—and the things he says and does, of course.

He's not THAT sketchy, he's really just a typical tech CEO. No one gives him credit for what he did

Re: The whole thing was a scam

#344
post #262

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you ever considered that they’re not fascists at all, don’t have the goals that you’re claiming they have, and don’t hold any of the views you claim they have?

They say they hold fascistic views publicly, they praise fascists in other countries, current or deceased, and they are enacting fascistic policies all over, why would I consider that?

None of that is accurate.

Re: The whole thing was a scam

#346

Earlier quoted context omitted.

wow. you're comparing EU: crimes happened, were exposed, people suffered consequences, with USA: no criminal suffered anything, president joining on a genocide for real state deals bribe, etc. kinda a stretch, don't you think?

How many people have suffered consequences anyway? Epstein ran a large sex abuse network and and even larger corruption network. How many people have been sentenced so far? How many are even being investigated? While most of the network in in the US, there are very many highly placed people in Europe who will have been involved, and so far only a few have suffered. One Norwegian charged, two in the UK under investiga…

are you really not following uk Prince, Netherlands prime minister, france probes, etc etc?

Re: The whole thing was a scam

#347
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's your argument here? He's not allowed to discuss crony capitalism because you imagine that he thinks LLMs suddenly became reliable.

It’s a comment about who Gary Marcus is presenting himself as My intention is for other people to think what I believe which is Gary Marcus is a hack and has no business being listened to with respect to technical evaluation of AI because he’s not technically competent enough to do. The existence of his polemics waste everybody’s time and generally waste resources like we’re wasting right now. His entire schtick has…

The guy founded two AI companies and exited one, is a researcher who is an expert on how actual human babies learns things and who has done research comparing how LLMs learn and represent language compared to humans. How much more expertise does he need to have an opinion?
Post reply on HN