Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Mozilla hasn't had the benefit of the doubt for quite a while here In contrast to Google Chrome? This is just FUD. Ublock Origin is still working and will be working. Full customization is still there and isn't going away. All of that is unlike in Chrom(ium).
If you need to compare yourself to the literal devil then you're probably far from a saint yourself.
No AI* Here – A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter
341–344 of 344 posts
Re: No AI* Here – A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter
#342Re: No AI* Here – A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter
#343Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is an absurd take. The meaning of "selling" is extremely broad, courts have found such language to apply to transactions as simple as providing an http request in exchange for an http response. Their lawyers must have been begging them to remove that language for the liability it represents. For all purposes actually relevant to privacy, the updated language is more specific and just as strong.
If they were only selling data in such an 'innocent' way, couldn't they clearly state that, in addition to whatever legalese they're required to provide?
> You give Mozilla the rights necessary to operate Firefox. This includes processing your data as we describe in the Firefox Privacy Notice. It also includes a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license for the purpose of doing as you request with the content you input in Firefox. This does not give Mozilla any ownership in that content.
> (from the attached FAQ) Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data”), and we don’t buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of “sale of data” is extremely broad in some places, we’ve had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).
Re: No AI* Here – A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter
#344Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, several times a day. I use summarization for webpages, messages, documents and YouTube videos. It’s super handy. I mainly use a custom prompt using ChatGPT via the Raycast app and the Raycast browser extension. That said, I don’t feel comfortable with the level of AI being shoved into browsers by their vendors.
Aren't you worried it will fuck up your comprehension skills? Reading or listening.