Earlier quoted context omitted.
Private planes dont need air traffic controllers?
it depends on the airport and airspace. it's not required everywhere.
US air traffic controllers start resigning as shutdown bites
341–350 of 397 posts
Re: US air traffic controllers start resigning as shutdown bites
#342Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't escape the impression that the person currently most responsible for these shortsighted decisions simply doesn't care what happens after he's gone.
Now, either (except, of course, to himself).
Re: US air traffic controllers start resigning as shutdown bites
#343Re: US air traffic controllers start resigning as shutdown bites
#344Re: US air traffic controllers start resigning as shutdown bites
#345Re: US air traffic controllers start resigning as shutdown bites
#346A quick search shows that there are over 20,000 ATCs employed in the United States. (I'm not confident in the sources I found - anyone know where to get reliable stats for things like this?) Is the number of retiring ATCs higher than normal? I assume it is, but the article doesn't mention the baseline. It's hard for me to understand the scale of the issue from this article alone.
If we take the lower number of 15, than that is nearly 5.5k a year. Even if we round it down, that'd be 25% a year if your number is right and this situation continued. Of course it can't continue very long, because there won't be that many old enough to have the choice, presumably. But it's a crazy rate.
Re: US air traffic controllers start resigning as shutdown bites
#347I'm a heavy gamer. I like lots of strategy games. Sometimes I look at our country like a strategy game: where we are investing resources, infrastructure planning and investment, active problems or threats and how they are being prioritized and handled, managing citizen happiness, etc. The last 10-20 years feel like a massive lost opportunity to invest in some of these improvements and forward-thinking planning. In th…
Re: US air traffic controllers start resigning as shutdown bites
#348I get that the Trump admin doesn't care a bit about the impact of the shutdown on the general population (they're fighting in court for NOT having to release the emergency funding that would instantly reinstate SNAP) and probably even welcome it as an opportunity for "government downsizing" - but things like air traffic becoming restricted would start to touch even the areas that the ultra-rich are interested in, wou…
yes but Musk has claimed he could trivially re-implement the system with more or less only using AI putting aside weather that is true or not and just assume it to be true for the later argument then it is the perfect chance to replace a public service the country depends on by a billionaire controlled private company thats how you convert a country to an oligarchy, bit by bit replacing essential parts with entities…
He is wrong about that.
That being said... there's a lot of low-hanging fruit to pick in terms of efficiency gains for the current system.
Re: US air traffic controllers start resigning as shutdown bites
#349I get that the Trump admin doesn't care a bit about the impact of the shutdown on the general population (they're fighting in court for NOT having to release the emergency funding that would instantly reinstate SNAP) and probably even welcome it as an opportunity for "government downsizing" - but things like air traffic becoming restricted would start to touch even the areas that the ultra-rich are interested in, wou…
In the current electorate, Democrats are supported by a majority of both low-income and high-income voters. Republicans even it out by having a majority of the middle income voters, especially those without a college degree.
It didn't use to be like this. But now it is.
Re: US air traffic controllers start resigning as shutdown bites
#350A quick search shows that there are over 20,000 ATCs employed in the United States. (I'm not confident in the sources I found - anyone know where to get reliable stats for things like this?) Is the number of retiring ATCs higher than normal? I assume it is, but the article doesn't mention the baseline. It's hard for me to understand the scale of the issue from this article alone.
If we take the lower number of 15, than that is nearly 5.5k a year. Even if we round it down, that'd be 25% a year if your number is right and this situation continued. Of course it can't continue very long, because there won't be that many old enough to have the choice, presumably. But it's a crazy rate.