Ruby core team takes ownership of RubyGems and Bundler

Post by mijoharas » Sat, Oct 18, 2025, 8:25 AM UTC

dontlaugh wrote: post #326

mijoharas wrote: post #289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh no, looks like you're one of today's (unlucky) 10000[0]. (For context I only heard about all this recently). For the DHH thing he wrote a recent blog post where he said he wants fewer non-white people in London and praises an english far-right fascist figure (Tommy Robinson)[1]. Not really sure about the Shopify stuff. I've heard people aren't too fond of Tobi (the C.E.O. I think), and he's buddies with DHH, but i…

As an outsider to Ruby I kept hearing rumours and thinking it has to be exaggerated. No, it turns out DHH really wrote a blog post complaining not enough people in London are white (even though they’re British) and praising a famous British fascist. The rest is very much still confusing, some kind of opportunistic power plays and typical open source chaos.

Post by [deleted] » Sat, Oct 18, 2025, 10:32 AM UTC

mijoharas wrote: post #335

ergocoder wrote: post #320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I read it and I don't see it. He praised one policy from Tommy Robinson. This doesn't mean he support every single action performed by Tommy Robinson for eternity. He advocates for stricter immigration laws and is against mass immigration. He then praises the stricter immigration laws in Denmark. Then, Denmark would be considered facist and ethno-nationalistic by your logic? > I don't think you can get mad at people…

I disagree, wanting stricter immigration is not fascist, and isn't the problem I have with the article. He argues that non-White people aren't British[0], that's the bit where it gets a bit fascist for me. There's a debate to be had about immigration, that I think is valid. I think there's nothing wrong with advocating to reduce immigration. I think saying non-White people (who were born here, just so we can get away…

Post by davidgerard » Sat, Oct 18, 2025, 11:01 AM UTC

the_mitsuhiko wrote: post #33

sam_lowry_ wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> Remember why the lucky stiff? I remember _why and I definitely don't remember him as toxic.

Post by the_mitsuhiko » Sat, Oct 18, 2025, 11:25 AM UTC

davidgerard wrote: post #345

the_mitsuhiko wrote: post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Remember why the lucky stiff? I remember _why and I definitely don't remember him as toxic.

the one from Bluesky with the public real name? That one's literally a vibecamp neoreactionary, so ...

Post by nurettin » Sat, Oct 18, 2025, 12:13 PM UTC

thunky wrote: post #238

nurettin wrote: post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

You're not doing a good job of proving them wrong.