Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

One to two Starlink satellites are falling back to Earth each day

earthsky.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

341–347 of 347 posts

Re: One to two Starlink satellites are falling back to Earth each day

#341

Post by reactordev »

gitaarik wrote: post #312
reactordev wrote: post #212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Indeed, working as intended. SpaceX said at the beginning that this was how they would “clean up” older gen sats.

Is this a common approach? Seems strange this happens on such a scale now without much scrutiny.

As common as Starlink is… no one has sent that many satellites into space and before they even got approval, this was discussed at length. They would fire retrograde and deorbit, burning them up in the atmospheric re-entry.

https://www.starlink.com/public-files/Starlink_Approach_to_S...

Re: One to two Starlink satellites are falling back to Earth each day

#342

Post by randyrand »

superkuh wrote: post #17

Short lifetime and quick re-entry is a great feature of vLEO constellations. No long term space junk. Compare that to MEO or GEO where sats are there pretty much forever (hundreds to thousands of years). Or even high LEO with many tens of years.

It’s weird to hear the term “forever” to refer to thousands of years in the context of space.

Re: One to two Starlink satellites are falling back to Earth each day

#343

Post by oceanplexian »

xnx wrote: post #16
oceanplexian wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A single terminal could serve an entire African village. It's also serving use cases in the Ukraine war, ships at sea, Antarctic research stations, numerous aerospace and military use cases, and so on. DTC is provide texting and emergency services to countless people who might need it in an emergancy, like we saw in North Carolina. Last and most importantly, Starlink exists is to create revenue for SpaceX and to fund…

> The value to humanity of Starship succeeding at its goals is extremely high. Starship to orbit sounds useful, but Starship to Mars is near useless. If that's what rich people want to spend their money on, go nuts.

> Starship to orbit sounds useful, but Starship to Mars is near useless.

A single astronaut with a shovel could do more science in a couple days than all the probes combined in the last 54 years (Which have barely scratched the surface). For all we know there are literal fossils a few meters below the surface but none of our technology had the ability to even start looking.

Re: One to two Starlink satellites are falling back to Earth each day

#344

Post by TheAlchemist »

inemesitaffia wrote: post #280
TheAlchemist wrote: post #239

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, I don't think there is any relationship there. I'm saying that I highly doubt the real profitability of SpaceX / Starlink, and we will only see if it's really as good as they say, once the bubble pops and there is no inifinite capital, and maybe some accountability.

They aren't raising money. What's there to pop?

Sure, just like xAI is never raising any money (according to Elon). All of his companies are very tightly interconnected, so you should see them as a whole.

Re: One to two Starlink satellites are falling back to Earth each day

#345

Post by inemesitaffia »

TheAlchemist wrote: post #344
inemesitaffia wrote: post #280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They aren't raising money. What's there to pop?

Sure, just like xAI is never raising any money (according to Elon). All of his companies are very tightly interconnected, so you should see them as a whole.

When money is actually raised people talk.

Sovereign wealth funds and bankers like to talk about their investments even in leaks to Journalists of things under NDA.

Re: One to two Starlink satellites are falling back to Earth each day

#346

Post by [deleted] »

leptons wrote: post #336
JumpCrisscross wrote: post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Every story I've ever heard about "Starship" is how it is going to Mars to take humans there to build a colony Could this reflect your media diet? > never once heard that "Starship" will be used to launch even more starlink satellites That's kind of wild. I understand getting the PR stuff first, but every newspaper I read mentions Starlink whenever SpaceX comes up, unless it's about a launch explosion or Artemis. >…

>Could this reflect your media diet? It could reflect SpaceX's bad PR. I read plenty of news sources, and the most that makes it out there is how the latest Starship blew up, yet again. Not great PR. And beyond that, the scope of the thing is to go to Mars. It's up to SpaceX to get the PR out there, not for me to seek out niche news sources. But thanks for trying to make this about me failing instead of SpaceX failin…

[deleted]

Re: One to two Starlink satellites are falling back to Earth each day

#347

Post by inemesitaffia »

leptons wrote: post #336
JumpCrisscross wrote: post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Every story I've ever heard about "Starship" is how it is going to Mars to take humans there to build a colony Could this reflect your media diet? > never once heard that "Starship" will be used to launch even more starlink satellites That's kind of wild. I understand getting the PR stuff first, but every newspaper I read mentions Starlink whenever SpaceX comes up, unless it's about a launch explosion or Artemis. >…

>Could this reflect your media diet? It could reflect SpaceX's bad PR. I read plenty of news sources, and the most that makes it out there is how the latest Starship blew up, yet again. Not great PR. And beyond that, the scope of the thing is to go to Mars. It's up to SpaceX to get the PR out there, not for me to seek out niche news sources. But thanks for trying to make this about me failing instead of SpaceX failin…

Lol you have been warned.

He's actually right.

When SpaceX talks about making money from Starship. It's Starlink

Post reply on HN