341–350 of 656 posts
https://www-dr-dk.translate.goog/nyheder/viden/teknologi/ana...
It is very obvious that he doesn't understand e2e, yet he will not listen. Bro couldn't even read the Wikipedia page
Imagine a future where it becomes easier to commit terrorism because of some technological advancements—like smaller, less traceable bombs, or chemical weapons that are easily accessible and lead to higher casualties—like in the 1,000s or more. Imagine in that scenario, that the likelihood of you or someone you know becoming the victim of a terrorist attack is now non-trivial in your society. In a future where this b…
On your tangent about China, the people there are feeling so absolutely safe that they have the urge to install metal bars on every window of almost every home.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What proof is there that peddlers of child pornography are using chat to distribute CSAM? Are you kidding me? How do you think predators get in contact with children? Over social media that children use, obviously. And of course many criminals use chat. Most have no clue about encryption, like the vast majority of humans.
“Distribute” not “contact”. Unless you want to scan all chat messages for potential signs of adults engaging in grooming of children too? Talk about a slippery slope, you’re basically making my point.
Well, the point is to scan all messages, period.
And then to detect those that come from predators, not adults. How often do parents convince their children to send... revealing pictures? Or to meet them somewhere? How often do parents introduce themselves to their children in messages?
You can't seriously believe that a conversation between parents and children always looks like a conversation between a predator and children, can you?
You can ban this at a provider scale, but you simply can't track or enforce custom implementations at a small scale.
Dear citizens of the EU: If this gets pushed through, you will gradually lose control of your government much like how the people of the UK already lost control of theirs. What are you going to do when the government's interests inevitably drift out of alignment with yours? Start a political movement? You will have the police knocking on your door for criticizing the establishment. Start a revolution? You have no wea…
> Start a revolution? You have no weapons. You can't even organize a resistance because all channels of communication are monitored. Unlike which country? The US I presume? I see very much a lack of any revolutions in the US, and the most resistance done in the past few decades was done by people with no weapons. I'd say most revolution-like movements of any kind in the US since the Civil War happened without weapons…
Most arguments I see against ChatControl sound like bullshit to me. How do we expect to convince anyone to go against ChatControl with those? I feel unease when it comes to ChatControl; I don't want my devices to run proprietary, opaque algorithms on all my data. And it feels like it fundamentally has to be opaque: nobody can't publish an open source list of illegal material together with their hash (precisely becaus…
From the European Convention on Human Rights[1]:
ARTICLE 8
Right to respect for private and family life
1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family
life, his home and his correspondence.
2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the
exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the
law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of
national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the
country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection
of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms
of others.
My layman understanding of the usual process is like, we want surveillance over those people and if it seems reasonable a judge might say ok but for a limited time. Watching everyone's communications also seems at odds with the principle of proportionality[2].
[1]https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Convention_ENG
[2]https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12...
It's a good campaign, but let's say national elections are coming, one should know which politicians are in favour or against.
How else can we let our opinion be known other than by voting for the right politicians?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So what? If predators cannot talk to children over SnapChat, that's a win, wouldn't you say? The only valid argument I see against ChatControl is that fundamentally, you cannot know what it is reporting. It's not like if there would be an open source list of illegal material together with the hashes, right? If you cannot audit what is being reporting (with whatever means necessary to make sure it is doing what it sho…
> The only valid argument Really? The only one?