Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hundreds to thousands of buildings over seventy years is a "singular success?" I personally know dozens of people who grew up in Mitchell-Lama housing. Tens to hundreds of thousands of people still do. But because other implementations are less successful (which is debatable, especially as you've provided zero examples), we should scrap successful ones? Or am I missing your point? Please do elucidate. Edit: It occurs…
Mitchell–Lama Housing Program Is specifically NOT public housing and you are calling me ignorant. JFC dude it’s a great private sector tax abatement program but this is a comment about Cabrini Green type projects.
You go ahead and keep moving the goalposts, friend. You can do that all by yourself. kthxbai!