Live data from Hacker News

Good Writing

paulgraham.com

341–345 of 345 posts

Re: Good Writing

#341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> He also should have run this through a spell checker. What's an example of a spelling mistake in it? I read it carefully and didn't notice any.

Gonna leave that as an exercise to the reader. (You could run it through a spell checker, too.)

There aren't any spelling errors. If you want to claim otherwise it would be easy for you to show examples.

Re: Good Writing

#342

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I took Intro to Modern Philosophy with one of the top Kant scholars in the world, and when we got to Kant the professor warned us that he was a brilliant thinker but a terrible writer. He shared the old philosophical cliche, "Hume wrote about complex ideas simply, Kant wrote about simple ideas complexly." And yet to this day I suspect that Kant got a lot right, or at least set the terms of debate for hundreds of year…

That tracks. Language is a kind of technology, that evolves to adapt to new uses. A simple elegant python program that fits on a slide might have taken tens of thousands of lines of obtuse fortran.

Yep, and Kant's writing in many ways is like early compiler design. Painful. Necessary. And built at a time when the cognitive architecture didn’t yet have shortcuts. He was writing in metaphysical FORTRAN.

Re: Good Writing

#343

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gonna leave that as an exercise to the reader. (You could run it through a spell checker, too.)

There aren't any spelling errors. If you want to claim otherwise it would be easy for you to show examples.

By now, it has been corrected. When I wrote my comment, "surprising" in end note [1] was misspelled "suprising."

Re: Good Writing

#344

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There aren't any spelling errors. If you want to claim otherwise it would be easy for you to show examples.

By now, it has been corrected. When I wrote my comment, "surprising" in end note [1] was misspelled "suprising."

Still visible at the internet archive, btw.

Re: Good Writing

#345

Reading Graham's essays on writing always puts me in mind of the videos where Mexican moms react to Rachael Ray trying to cook ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFN2g1FBgVA ), or a Malaysian guy has to watch a BBC cook make rice ( https://youtu.be/53me-ICi_f8?si=0AaZ82dk_AYFqJAx&t=226 ).

For me the beauty of idlewords's own blog ( https://idlewords.com/ ) is that it's so good it makes me want to write. Similarly, I find Graham's writing so bad that it also makes me want to write. (note: idlewords, if you see this, your blog is misbehaving at the moment. For example, PHP is complaining bitterly on this page right now: https://idlewords.com/2018/10/ )

My blog is static files. It preserves a moment in time when PHP was complaining, forever.
Post reply on HN