341–345 of 345 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is, just like having an armed policeman permanently stationed in your living room to protect you is a legitimate use case.
Truly excellent discourse. Thanks for such an enlightening contribution.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then unfortunately the internet will remain a luxury for people who aren’t able to afford the cost. The internet is a product, not a charity or human right.
The UN disagrees
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would like to point out that your perception of what a browser can/should be is based on what Google has turned browsers into. What a browser is in 2025 is vastly different from what anyone thought they would ever be. There are major, major issues with the way web engines/web browsers function today and much of those issues stem from Google's near monopoly on browsers. There was a lot of very interesting and good d…
What do browsers do that they weren’t meant to? The only thing that comes to mind is password management. But I would also argue that’s a boon for normal users and trust in the web.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would selling change anything? There are a lot of sites and apps that only work in Chrome that Google didn’t make.
This is monopolistic behaviour: it leverages a product (Workgroups) to force a minority group to switch to another product (Chrome). Most users of Workgroups don’t have an option to change, because it’s provided for them by their company.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The UN disagrees
I know GP said internet, but browsers give access to the web, not internet. Does the UN consider internet a human right, or the web?