Live data from Hacker News

Apple announces ability to download apps directly from websites in EU

macrumors.com

341–350 of 1001 posts

Re: Apple announces ability to download apps directly from websites in EU

#341
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The one million requirement is where you start paying them the 50cts per install, right?

An interesting perspective, makes it surprisingly fair play and totally crippling to third parties at the same time. I guess the outcome will be that outside some completely irrelevant oddballs there will just be one or two entities like Epic serving the intersection of non-casual gamers and people who consider the iPhone a gaming platform and they won't pull much market away from Apple, but serve as a limiter to how…

> surprisingly fair play

And they'll be fairly fined for it

Re: Apple announces ability to download apps directly from websites in EU

#342
post #72

As an Apple customer in the EU, I'm staying on iOS 17.3 until they rewrite 17.4 4-5 times based on how many times they get fined again for malicious compliance.

Realistically, if Apple is determined to fight this, it may drag on for years.

Just switch to Android, why take this kind of user hostility from Apple?

Re: Apple announces ability to download apps directly from websites in EU

#343

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> That's probably to prevent the most obvious workaround of creating a new shell company for every million users. Which would be all around moot because the fee itself is illegal.

> Which would be all around moot because the fee itself is illegal I haven’t seen any statement in any jurisdiction by lawmakers or judges that supports that claim. It also would, to me, feel inconsistent with the rulings I read about: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_Games_v._Apple#Decision : “Rogers found in favor of Apple on nine of ten counts brought up against them in the case, including Epic's charges relat…

You missed that this is the DMA we're talking about. All those cases are either out of its jurisdiction or predate the Act's passage.

Re: Apple announces ability to download apps directly from websites in EU

#344
post #302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're not general purpose computers, even if architecturally they could be. Apple amply touted the iPhone's capacities ("there's an app for that") and smartphones are defacto a core component of our lives. The Switch isn't.

What applications are necessary to call it a general purpose computer? A web browser? A self-hosted development environment? I don't think there's a bright line between what applications a Playstation or Xbox has versus what a phone has. And it's not like the iPhone is the only phone you can get. If Apple is restricting such a core component of our lives, you can simply buy non-Apple products.

Games consoles are designed, marketed and used to play games and for similar entertainment purposes.

You are not going to do your online banking on an Xbox, or write a letter on a PlayStation, even if the hardware is theoretically capable of that, it’s just not what it’s for.

Re: Apple announces ability to download apps directly from websites in EU

#345

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What regulations are you referring to wrt AT&T? Are you saying that UNIX and C were a result of regulations? If so do you have a source?

The very short is, that AT&T between 1974 and 1982, due to the telephony monopoly rulings, wasn't allowed to sell software. Thus they gave their research results to universities, like Berkely.

How different is that from tech giants using their monopoly profits to develop software that they give away for free? You say AT&T gave away some software to universities. Similarly Google gives away Go (among many other projects) as FOSS for anyone to use. If Google didn't have to worry about money, they might not develop these things to give away for free.

Re: Apple announces ability to download apps directly from websites in EU

#346
post #109

i don't understand how the EU didn't put up a very simple rule : users owns their phones and should be able to install any software they want without apple putting artificial restrictions or gateways exclusivity. Period. That should remove all the possibilities of apple trying to find the loopholes with shit measures such as those "options".

Or alternatively, that the manufacturer shall have no special privileges when it comes to software. The OS APIs needs to be public and if Apple can do something, someone else unauthorized should be able to do it also. This would also apply the play store privileges on Android, but that is a much less egregious violation than what Apple does.

Google Play store has some exclusive privileges?

Re: Apple announces ability to download apps directly from websites in EU

#347

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> That's probably to prevent the most obvious workaround of creating a new shell company for every million users. Which would be all around moot because the fee itself is illegal.

> Which would be all around moot because the fee itself is illegal I haven’t seen any statement in any jurisdiction by lawmakers or judges that supports that claim. It also would, to me, feel inconsistent with the rulings I read about: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_Games_v._Apple#Decision : “Rogers found in favor of Apple on nine of ten counts brought up against them in the case, including Epic's charges relat…

The Epic ruling is in the US and are irrelevant to EU regulations. Dutch regulators have rejected Apple's response to the dating app ruling, and that matter is currently in the courts[1]. Lastly, these latest changes are in response to a new law, the Digital Markets Act.

[1] https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/01/apple_app_rules_nethe...

Re: Apple announces ability to download apps directly from websites in EU

#348
post #109

i don't understand how the EU didn't put up a very simple rule : users owns their phones and should be able to install any software they want without apple putting artificial restrictions or gateways exclusivity. Period. That should remove all the possibilities of apple trying to find the loopholes with shit measures such as those "options".

Or alternatively, that the manufacturer shall have no special privileges when it comes to software. The OS APIs needs to be public and if Apple can do something, someone else unauthorized should be able to do it also. This would also apply the play store privileges on Android, but that is a much less egregious violation than what Apple does.

They already did that.

Article 6(7):

> The gatekeeper shall allow business users and alternative providers of services provided together with, or in support of, core platform services, free of charge, effective interoperability with, and access for the purposes of interoperability to, the same operating system, hardware or software features, regardless of whether those features are part of the operating system, as are available to, or used by, that gatekeeper when providing such services.

Re: Apple announces ability to download apps directly from websites in EU

#349
post #279

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

What’s the woke culture mind virus?

Why would you ask that? Don't you realise the extra work @dang has to do when you trigger these posters?

Have a heart and spare a thought the guy works hard.

Re: Apple announces ability to download apps directly from websites in EU

#350

Apple is still non-compliant with the requirements of the DMA, especially in regards to Article 6(7), which provides: "The gatekeeper shall allow business users and alternative providers of services provided together with, or in support of, core platform services, free of charge, effective interoperability with, and access for the purposes of interoperability to, the same operating system, hardware or software featur…

Wow, I can't believe how blatant their non-compliance is. That'll be some interesting legal advice they have.
Post reply on HN