Live data from Hacker News

Charlie Munger has died

berkshirehathaway.com

341–350 of 454 posts

Re: Charlie Munger has died

#341
post #34

One of the greats of investing. And a value investor. It's all about the profits, not the growth. Munger is gone, Bogle is gone, Buffett is 93. Who takes up the mantle of value investing now?

> Munger is gone, Bogle is gone, Buffett is 93. Who takes up the mantle of value investing now? Bogle was not a value investor. He was a low(er)-costs advocate (and not even necessarily passive/index investing: e.g., Vanguard has active funds).

Vanguard lucked into hiring one of the greatest fund managers of all time in John Neff.

There were very, very few people who could do what he did.

Re: Charlie Munger has died

#342
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You have to remember that Bogle/Munger/Buffet all gained prominence when value investing wasn't a thing and investing of any kind was wildly out of reach for the common man. Today anyone can go online and buy VTI in minutes. Every financial advisor and 401k plan recommends index funds by default, and it is how the vast majority of people and organizations store their wealth. It doesn't need any more cheerleaders or i…

> Every financial advisor and 401k plan recommends index funds by default, and it is how the vast majority of people and organizations store their wealth. It doesn't need any more cheerleaders or icons. It had simply become synonymous with investing at large. This is passive investing, not value investing. Value investing is very much active investing, otherwise how would you select the undervalued assets? Value inve…

Here is what Buffett says about value investing (in his 1992 BRK shareholder letter):"In addition, we think the very term “value investing” is redundant. What is “investing” if it is not the act of seeking value at least sufficient to justify the amount paid? Consciously paying more for a stock than its calculated value—in the hope that it can soon be sold for a still-higher price—should be labeled speculation (which is neither illegal, immoral nor—in our view—financially fattening).

Whether appropriate or not, the term “value investing” is widely used. Typically, it connotes the purchase of stocks having attributes such as a low ratio of price to book value, a low price-earnings ratio, or a high dividend yield. Unfortunately, such characteristics, even if they appear in combination, are far from determinative as to whether an investor is indeed buying something for what it is worth and is therefore truly operating on the principle of obtaining value in his investments. Correspondingly, opposite characteristics—a high ratio of price to book value, a high price-earnings ratio, and a low dividend yield—are in no way inconsistent with a “value” purchase."

Excerpt from (my non-monetized blog): https://sileret.com/projects/buffett-shareholder-letters/199...

Original 1992 shareholder letter here: https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/1992.html

Re: Charlie Munger has died

#343
post #174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorta? Historically you typically bought shares in blocks of 100 and the transaction fees were also meaningful. You couldn't easily buy 1 share of a $20 stock. If you had to buy 100 shares @ $20, that's $2,000 - in 1970 that was a lot of money. Now, of course, you can buy fractional shares with no transaction fees. (Ignoring things like payment for order flow, etc.)

My first stock purchase was in 1982. 60 shares of Boeing at $16/share and $29.52 commission.

So that is about $3k in todays money you had laying around and could risk. Are you sure you are well attuned what is within the reach of the common man?

Re: Charlie Munger has died

#344
post #239

You cannot spend a billion in one century if you spend $25K per day, I cannot understand why a billionaire will work until the age of 99..

Almost any human being can live extremely comfortably with no financial worries at around $30m net worth. After $30m, it becomes a game of pride, ego and high scores.

Re: Charlie Munger has died

#345
post #241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>They bought a beloved, family-owned brand, cut costs, and jacked up prices. Berkshire by design doesn't influence how the companies they bought are run.

The current CEO of See's is Pat Egan. Prior to this, Egan was an SVP at NV Energy, another Berkshire company. It's a pretty crazy coincidence that the CEO of See's would be an existing Berkshire employee if Berkshire had no influence in how the company was run.

They kept Chuck until he retired. If they wanted to influence sees they would have replaced him the moment they bought it.

Additionally buying Sees is what proved their model of investing in well run companies is a worthwhile strategy in the first place.

https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/2012/08/chuck-...

Re: Charlie Munger has died

#346
post #132

A legend of the business and investing world. Acquired podcast got to do one of (possible the) last interviews with him a month ago for anyone looking for recent content from him: https://www.acquired.fm/episodes/charlie-munger Also Stripe Press is releasing just next week a book (technically re-release of an older book) on his collected thoughts: https://press.stripe.com/poor-charlies-almanack

This is one of his greatest. I wrote a nice summary of Poor Charlie’s Almanack back in 2021 which I’ve occasionally kept coming back to. I think today I‘ll revisit it with a sense of emptiness inside me. I’m sharing it here for others to enjoy: https://www.lostbookofsales.com/notes/poor-charlies-almanack...

Nice work but the scrolling in mobile terrible, making it hard to read.

Re: Charlie Munger has died

#347
This saddens me. I recently started psychology of human misjudgement.

Someone in thread asked what’s big deal about him. what did he achieve

My answer would be I never tried to look into his achievements or did care about them. The man was genuinely curious, humble and a geek. He constantly published his ways of thinking. I enjoyed how he thought about things, how i could relate self correct based on it.

Re: Charlie Munger has died

#348
post #34

One of the greats of investing. And a value investor. It's all about the profits, not the growth. Munger is gone, Bogle is gone, Buffett is 93. Who takes up the mantle of value investing now?

> Who takes up the mantle of value investing now?

Why would it be important that a particular flavour of investor (wealth accruer) is around?

Re: Charlie Munger has died

#349
post #132

A legend of the business and investing world. Acquired podcast got to do one of (possible the) last interviews with him a month ago for anyone looking for recent content from him: https://www.acquired.fm/episodes/charlie-munger Also Stripe Press is releasing just next week a book (technically re-release of an older book) on his collected thoughts: https://press.stripe.com/poor-charlies-almanack

This is one of his greatest. I wrote a nice summary of Poor Charlie’s Almanack back in 2021 which I’ve occasionally kept coming back to. I think today I‘ll revisit it with a sense of emptiness inside me. I’m sharing it here for others to enjoy: https://www.lostbookofsales.com/notes/poor-charlies-almanack...

Great summary. One I'll be revisiting myself every now and then.
Post reply on HN