Live data from Hacker News

Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message

twitter.com

341–350 of 433 posts

Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message

#341
post #248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The official/default list doesn’t block these though, so we are not supposed to make use of the user defined filters for now?

The authors of the default filter lists definitely try and block these - the biggest problems seem to be YouTube changing things faster than the default filter lists normally auto-update, or other filters/extensions conflicting. Ref: https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/173jmog/youtu...

Greetings, Professor Falken.

Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message

#342

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe this is what you are looking for: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37873749 But I also recommend purchasing YouTube Premium if you watch a decent amount. I find it to be a great value.

Youtube Premium is a waste of money, they bundle a crappy $11/m music service with it, for $13/m. It's worse than having to pay for cable or landline telephone to get internet. I'd pay $2/m, or even $4 bucks, for ad-free Youtube, but I'm not buying an additional music service I don't want or need.

Yup, this is exactly why I don’t subscribe. I already pay for Spotify so I don’t need another music service.

I’d happily pay for just no ads.

Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message

#343
post #133
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure it is, you're not even involved in the transaction. Just because someone pays Google to show an ad doesn't mean you have to look at it. USPS is funded by ads going through the mail and I throw them straight in the trash without remorse. I bet you do too. Bet you don't feel guilt about going to the bathroom or fast-forwarding your DVR during commercials either. Ad space is sold on the possibility that someone wil…

> Just because someone pays Google to show an ad doesn't mean you have to look at it Just because someone has an internet connection doesn't mean google has to serve them videos, either.

I’m confused. Google doesn’t serve every internet connection videos. The serve people asking for videos.

Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message

#345
post #178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If Costco decided they wanted to make a profit on their 1.50$ hot dogs and cranked the price up to 3$, they would lose a ton of goodwill and many of their loyal customers would be upset. Google isn’t exactly struggling to make ends meet. They seem perfectly okay to be losing money on search. YouTube is no different.

The hot dogs are getting more and more noticeable as everything else there seems majorly overpriced. $10 for some half sandwich?

Pizza is also cheap.

Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message

#347
post #80
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's the point of blocking ads when they're already not present? Or are you saying that we should block ads and refuse to pay? How is that sustainable in the long term? If you're against ads, shouldn't you support monetization models that don't involve ads?

We treat google how they treat us, as exploitive as possible.

i love paying for nebula and support my favorite creators there and blocking everything else on youtube

Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message

#348

I think the only "happy ending for everyone" if Google is going to ban ad-blockers for YouTube is if they make the ads less annoying. What makes YouTube's ads annoying: - the number of them 2 ads at the start is way too much. 1 max. Middle of video ads should be content creator controlled. - the ads they choose to show Google showing me the same few very annoying (to me) ads and gives me no option to avoid those spec…

The happy ending here would be Google being less monopolist with video streaming.

Google has done an outstanding job to use their position making YouTube the streaming platform of the Web, GCP incentives, dominance in smart TV, Google account integration, Android etc. This isn't mentioned enough.

Now we're seeing a strategy towards Premium and anti ad blocking patterns while they remain top and any alternatives just can't get a footing in this space to compete.

Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message

#349

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At this point, I consider blocking ads to be a moral obligation. By giving in, you enable Youtube to abuse users further

I think this is a bad take, because YouTube is a rare web service that allows you to just pay them directly. Then you aren’t the product anymore

How many hours daily you spend on YT?

Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message

#350
post #92

Maybe it's just A/B testing, but I got the "3 strikes and no more video playback" thing, which this DOM element blocking doesn't work around it seems :( After years of procrastinating, I'm finally gonna get around to setting up a basic homelab to run pihole. Thanks, youtube execs and bean counters, for kicking my lazy ass into gear on this! In a way, I kinda wish that ads worked as well as youtube suggestions. If one…

Mate if you get so much value from YouTube that you'll jump through these hoops just to use it without ads, why not just subscribe to premium? Personally it's by far my most bang-for-buck service.

To avoid giving an evil, untrustworthy corporation money?
Post reply on HN