Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doesn’t the FBI also have a large biological analysis team? For bio terror ?
I think if anything COVID has shown us that biological warfare makes as much sense as nuclear: none. In our globally connected world it's mutually assured destruction, and that's without even the need for your enemy to maintain stockpiles of weapons. The virus will find itself within your own borders soon enough.
Lab leak most likely origin of Covid-19 pandemic, U.S. agency now says
341–350 of 1001 posts
Re: Lab leak most likely origin of Covid-19 pandemic, U.S. agency now says
#342Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doesn’t the FBI also have a large biological analysis team? For bio terror ?
I think if anything COVID has shown us that biological warfare makes as much sense as nuclear: none. In our globally connected world it's mutually assured destruction, and that's without even the need for your enemy to maintain stockpiles of weapons. The virus will find itself within your own borders soon enough.
Re: Lab leak most likely origin of Covid-19 pandemic, U.S. agency now says
#343Re: Lab leak most likely origin of Covid-19 pandemic, U.S. agency now says
#344Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think if anything COVID has shown us that biological warfare makes as much sense as nuclear: none. In our globally connected world it's mutually assured destruction, and that's without even the need for your enemy to maintain stockpiles of weapons. The virus will find itself within your own borders soon enough.
It still makes sense for things like anthrax that aren't easily communicable. Or botulinum toxin.
Re: Lab leak most likely origin of Covid-19 pandemic, U.S. agency now says
#345Earlier quoted context omitted.
The model wasn't bad , just useless.
Why useless? People have to attempt to predict the outcomes of elections, and have to do their best.
There are good reasons to have polls and predictions but they are far from necessary.
Re: Lab leak most likely origin of Covid-19 pandemic, U.S. agency now says
#346Earlier quoted context omitted.
The question is not whether the research was worth it overall. They denied there was even a possibility that lab leak was the cause of the pandemic. I'm more than happy to entertain the idea that the research is and was worth it. But we need to have an accurate accounting of recent events. They tried to completely shut that down. Thankfully, lately it seems that they failed.
There’s an immense benefit to being specific with both what you mean by lab leak (natural virus leaked or modified one did) and by “they” when you’re talking about coverups because it gets weirdly racist and conspiratorial in a hurry otherwise.
Please explain to me how position A) is more racist than position B)
A) Scientists all over the world, including Chinese, Americans, and others, made a fundamental misjudgement about the safety of the Wuhan virology lab, or perhaps viral experimentation generally, and the result was a global pandemic
Versus
B) Chinese people eating & trading wild and exotic meat unintentionally caused a global pandemic due to their consumption
Of course, neither theory is racist. That's a word that used to mean something (and I wish it still did!), but is mostly used today to shut down debate in Western countries.
Re: Lab leak most likely origin of Covid-19 pandemic, U.S. agency now says
#347Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
This supposes way too much intention that can much more easily be explained by incompetence. A lab doing questionable work with inadequate safety measures hiding a major leak to save face makes way more sense than a supervillain story.
Re: Lab leak most likely origin of Covid-19 pandemic, U.S. agency now says
#348Re: Lab leak most likely origin of Covid-19 pandemic, U.S. agency now says
#349Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Didn’t Trump literally call it the “China virus” for over a year? Almost from the start? I know he got a lot of pushback from the DNC over that.