Live data from Hacker News

Apple announces ‘upgrade’ to App Store pricing, adding 700 new price points

9to5mac.com

341–350 of 385 posts

Re: Apple announces ‘upgrade’ to App Store pricing, adding 700 new price points

#341

I’m not an App Store seller so I have no idea what this means. You can’t just pick any number that you want to sell your app for? You have predetermined prices set by Apple?

It works in tiers. You can set the price point to be tier 1, 2, 3, 4 and so on, with tier 1 being $0.99, or whatever the lowest price point is in all the other countries that the AppStore is in

Re: Apple announces ‘upgrade’ to App Store pricing, adding 700 new price points

#342
post #195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depends how you define the market. They are 100% a monopoly for the iOS apps market.

And Ferrari is a 100% monopoly supplier of Ferrari engines.

The Ferrari engine market doesn't quite have the importance of the billions of users, billions of dollars, globe spanning, App Store.

Re: Apple announces ‘upgrade’ to App Store pricing, adding 700 new price points

#343
post #289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Not sure why it should limit developers to that system but it certainly makes the system attractive/useful for many. Because most developers are presumably experts in programming* and whatever the domain of their app is* (game, drawing program, whatever) and not experts in the psychology of pricing (unless it's a pricing app I suppose!). Now so what? They could allow you to pick a predetermined price or type whatev…

The problem with appeal to authority on this is the same could have been said last week about why it wasn’t like this. It doesn’t make it any more reasonable it just explains it is the way it is.

They were exactly like this just with fewer price points.

Re: Apple announces ‘upgrade’ to App Store pricing, adding 700 new price points

#344

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple uses price points rather than having developers explicitly specify prices because they're currency-independent: you specify a price point and Apple chooses appropriate prices for each of the ~175 different storefronts where your app could be available. Apple then periodically adjusts the international prices as exchange rates fluctuate, to keep them in parity with the US prices at the same tiers. The alternativ…

Thank you for clarifying this. This is such an Apple thing to do. Frankly it doesn't matter what the exact price is. All economics are approximate.

Disagree on that. Is Apple trying to arbitrage currencies at this point?

Re: Apple announces ‘upgrade’ to App Store pricing, adding 700 new price points

#345

So, never having bothered with Apple hard-/software I am a bit confused... A developer can't just set a price for something? But then out of the first 10000 natural numbers, Apple semi-arbitrarily select a set of 900 "known-good" numbers that work well for prices? Like, as if the other numbers are somehow bad prices? If you charge someone $7,43 for something, the ghost of Steve Jobs will start haunting you? That's, l…

Why waste 4 bytes on a float when a 10 bit enum does the trick? With the cushy 1024 possibilities, they even have some room for expansion from the current 900 values.

Re: Apple announces ‘upgrade’ to App Store pricing, adding 700 new price points

#346
post #310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

To be fair, Americans (and anyone else) are right to resent sales taxes. And I’m saying that as an American who’s far to the left of what some call “socialism” in Europe. Sales taxes are highly regressive, disproportionately impacting those least able to afford them.

It's not really sensible to look at the regressivity of a tax in isolation.

On the tax side, there are other factors you might want to optimize, like how distortionary the tax is and how effective it is at raising revenue.

On the spending side, a regressive tax + a progressive government redistribution policy can end up being progressive overall. For example, any tax can be made to be as progressive as you want by redistributing some of the revenue as a UBI.

Sales taxes/VATs are very effective at raising revenue and are less distortionary than most of the alternatives. This makes them good for funding redistributive policies. They won't tax billionaires out of existence, but they're a good tool for states to have in their toolbox.

Re: Apple announces ‘upgrade’ to App Store pricing, adding 700 new price points

#347
post #220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only difference is that you can choose two kinds of evil for something required for everyday life, while you can live without a car or choose from several different ones. Owning the former platform is great power that shouldn’t be unilaterally controlled by a private company.

My parents get by entirely fine without a mobile device (smart or feature). It's convenient, but not required.

There was an article here yesterday about how new apartment buildings have only electronic locks that require either an iPhone or an Android to get into the apartment. I’m sure they’re not introducing those at a retirement home any time soon, but it’s increasingly becoming a requirement for daily life.

Re: Apple announces ‘upgrade’ to App Store pricing, adding 700 new price points

#348
Do you still have to pay $100 every year for the privilege of simply releasing an app?

I took one look at that and thought "fuck this". If you're a hobbyist with zero interest in making money off your apps, then you get a giant middle finger from Apple.

Re: Apple announces ‘upgrade’ to App Store pricing, adding 700 new price points

#350

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple uses price points rather than having developers explicitly specify prices because they're currency-independent: you specify a price point and Apple chooses appropriate prices for each of the ~175 different storefronts where your app could be available. Apple then periodically adjusts the international prices as exchange rates fluctuate, to keep them in parity with the US prices at the same tiers. The alternativ…

Thank you for clarifying this. This is such an Apple thing to do. Frankly it doesn't matter what the exact price is. All economics are approximate.

It's a decision that actually benefits the customer and developer enormously. Imo an "apple thing to do" is to change chargers simply to make a profit.

Apple handling price/international conversions and currency fluctuations seems immensely useful.

Post reply on HN