341–344 of 344 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The processor is very efficient. Four cores at 3,6GHz, and can support up to 128GB of RAM. Even AMD can't beat that.
Ryzen 3100 can do the same, at the same price point, and was released 5 months earlier than 10100F. Good for Intel for finally catching up?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
A consumer PC should see a single bit error roughly once a week. That’s hardly non-existent
According to who? I checked the edac module for a year on my work machine, and it never detected a single error. I know I'm just one anecdote, but I doubt I'm that lucky.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
XScale was an awesome processor. Not only was it competitive, but it was 100% completely open and documented.
I used it in a design. What I remember (it was a while ago) was the lack of OS and driver support from third party software houses. It was a mistake to use it.
With time I think it could have been a real contender.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It really depends on who the targeted customers are. I remember inquiring on some TI lines and being told by the rep that unless you’re a customer anticipating 1M+ units, that chip really isn’t available.
Is that one thousand, or one million?