Live data from Hacker News

Google releases Gemma 4 open models

deepmind.google

331–340 of 507 posts

Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models

#331

For those curious, on openrouter this is $0.14 input and $0.40 output, or ballpark half of Gemini flash lite 3.1 (googles current cheapest current gen closed model)

Doing a bit more research, this looks like it might perform roughly as well on text tasks with modest context windows, so may be just a better cheaper option unless you need a million token window.

Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models

#332
post #279
post #207

So what's the business strategy here? Google is the only USA based frontier lab releasing open models. I know they aren't doing it out of the goodness of their hearts.

https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-oss/

This is nearly a year old, which is a million years in LLM time.

Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models

#334

The wait is finally over. One or two iterations, and I’ll be happy to say that language models are more than fulfilling my most common needs when self-hosting. Thanks to the Gemma team!

I would be inclined to agree with this except that my "most common needs" keeps expanding and increasing in difficulty each year. In 2023 and 2024, most of my needs were asking models simple questions and getting a response. They were a drop-in replacement for Stack Overflow. I think the best open source models today that I can run on my laptop serve that need.

Now that coding agents are a thing my frame of reference has shifted to where I now consider a model that can be that my most common need. And unfortunately open models today cannot do that reliably. They might, like you said, be able to in a year or two, but by then the cloud models will have a new capability that I will come to regard as a basic necessity for doing software development.

All that said this looks like a great release and I'm looking forward to playing around with it.

Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models

#335
post #279

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-oss/

This is nearly a year old, which is a million years in LLM time.

*8 months

That doesn't make parent's claim true or even relevant.

And OpenAI could release an open model tomorrow. Nobody knows.

Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models

#336
The biggest story here is that this is Google handing Qwen the SOTA crown for small and medium models.

For the first time ever, a Chinese lab is at the frontier. Google and Nvidia are significantly behind, not just on benchmarks but real-world performance like tool calling accuracy.

Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models

#337

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are issues with the chat template right now[0], so tool calling does not work reliably[1]. Every time people try to rush to judge open models on launch day... it never goes well. There are ~always bugs on launch day. [0]: https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/21326 [1]: https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/issues/21316

What causes these? Given how simple the LLM interface is (just completion), why don't teams make a simple, standardized template available with their model release so the inference engine can just read it and work properly? Can someone explain the difficulty with that?

The model does have the format specified but there is no _one_ standard. For this model it’s defined in the [ tokenizer_config.json [0]. As for llama.cpp they seem to be using a more type safe approach to reading the arguments.

[0] https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-4-31B-it/blob/main/token...

Re: Google releases Gemma 4 open models

#338

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reversing the X and Y axis, adding in a few other random models, and dropping all the small Qwens makes this worse than useless as a Qwen 3.5 comparison, it’s actively misleading. If you’re using AI, please don’t rush to copy paste output :/ EDIT: Lordy, the small models are a shadow of Qwen's smalls. See https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B versus https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1salgre/gemma_4...

Small qwen models are magical

It's so so good.

I have an app I've been working on for 2.5 years and felt kinda stupid making sure llama.cpp worked everywhere, including Android and iOS.

The 0.8B beats every <= 7B model I've used on tool use and can do RAG. Like you could ship it to someone who didn't know AI and it can do all the basics and leave UX intact.

Post reply on HN