Live data from Hacker News

US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere

reuters.com

331–340 of 1001 posts

Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere

#332

What content bans does Europe have? /Confused European

Russia Today is banned, for one

You mean the TV station lost broadcasting-rights, or you mean the website it actually banned? Cause the website is certainly accessible for me from my European country, although that does not rule out that it is banned in some European countries.

Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere

#333
post #89

Can someone ELI5 how it actually works? Say I'm a UK citizen with advanced glioblastoma (implying loss of faculties, seizures, and pain; no cure, and things to worsen before eventually passing away, possibly some time from now). Suppose I wish to view websites on euthanasia options, but am blocked from doing so by the UK's Online Safety Act. How does/will Freedom.gov help? (is it essentially a free VPN?) Also, as oth…

And since euthanasia is not favoured by the religious right in the US (I assume here for sake of argument) it would be filtered by VPN / DNS anyway in the VPN

Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere

#334

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One is Russian media, just as Russia bans European media. Also the world's largest library is banned in Germany.

The first one I'm ok with, the second one I'm not sure what you're saying? Google suggests the largest library in the world is the US Congress library, but I couldn't find any sources saying it's banned in Germany? (Also, it's a physical place in the US... What?) Closest thing I could find to library banned in Germany was a collection of pirated material, which was blocked at a DNS level, meaning many users bypass th…

He probably means a famous pirating site, called library dot something.

Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere

#336

Won't those other nations just ban freedom.gov?

Since no one seems to have a serious answer to this…the answer is yes, it would easily be blocked. Beyond that, absolutely no one would use this service. Therefore, it can be considered to be nothing more than political posturing by a weak administration.

Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere

#337
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not sad. It's smart to ban hate speech, blatant lies and things like that. We know, we had the Nazis. Seems the US still has to learn a lesson or two, considering the current political situation. Hope it will not be as bad

> It's smart to ban hate speech Everyone has their own idea what hate is. For me: it is anyone saying any word with “a” in it. Better stay quiet, or it is hate speech.

In general the justice system don't care much what your idea of the law is.

If its not clear through the actuall law or the accompanying comments what constitutes hate speech, it will be cleared up by the court itself.

Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere

#338
post #89

Can someone ELI5 how it actually works? Say I'm a UK citizen with advanced glioblastoma (implying loss of faculties, seizures, and pain; no cure, and things to worsen before eventually passing away, possibly some time from now). Suppose I wish to view websites on euthanasia options, but am blocked from doing so by the UK's Online Safety Act. How does/will Freedom.gov help? (is it essentially a free VPN?) Also, as oth…

[flagged]

I didn't expect "Trump does yet another symbolic, counterproductive stunt" to be the political hot take that ticked off the hive.

Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere

#339
post #64

Sad that western Europe is pushing so hard for limits to free speech & privacy. I'm not surprised given their history, but it's sad nonetheless.

What limits? You can do pretty much what you want but make sure you can defend yourself in the court. I feel there is a bit of a disconnect in terms where people get the news where in US you kind of expect biggest news providers to be biassed, eg Fox, hence reliance on social media. In Europe gov media is quite strong and objective, and the idea that it restricts something is odd. A great example is the banning of RT…

> A great example is the banning of RT, they lost licenses IMO in multiple countries, but the agency was spreading a lot of lies. IMO what we all want is objective news reporting.

You shouldn't need a "license" to publish a website.

Re: US plans online portal to bypass content bans in Europe and elsewhere

#340
post #161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

According to Reuters, it will essentially be a free VPN. https://www.reuters.com/world/us-plans-online-portal-bypass-...

So you're not paying for it? In corporate america how is that going to be moneytized?

It's a government program. The tax payer pays the service provider, a company owned by some government official's cousin. Monetization happened just before your employer paid you this week.
Post reply on HN