Live data from Hacker News

Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech

news.fsu.edu

331–340 of 381 posts

Re: Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech

#331
In other words ChatGPT is catching up with my patterns of speech.

I really wish I had deleted all of my comments on Reddit before I nuked my account. It would have left a measurable hole.

I had a decade of being in a job with 80+% free time. It's quite possible 0.001% of everything in the training set came from me. I'm never going to be compensated, but I hope I didn't derange it too badly. ;-)

Re: Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech

#332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a lot better than reading a note to remind you to recite ridiculous white genocide in South Africa conspiracy theories every time you engage in a conversation.

wut

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/05/elon-...

Re: Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech

#333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Word and other editors/word processors change '--' to an em-dash I'd be suspicious of people doing their writing in Word and copying it over into random comment fields, too. > And the "slang version" of an em-dash is "I went to work--but forgot to put on pants", not "I went to work - but forgot to put on pants". The fun thing about slang is that different groups have different slangs! I use the latter pretty regula…

But do you call that latter thing you do “an em-dash”? Do you tell a peer “You should put an em-dash here” when what you mean is a “space en-dash space”?

I don't call it anything, because I'm not in the business of telling people how to write. (Besides asking them not to use SlopGPT, of course.)

Re: Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech

#334

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same thing as with em dashes. Some of us have been using em dashes from before ChatGPT.

No one uses em dashes with no space between the separating letters at the beginning and end of one, though - like GPT does.

I and many others do. It's common in formal writing such as academic papers. It's also the most agreed upon correct use of em dash.

Re: Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech

#335
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same thing as with em dashes. Some of us have been using em dashes from before ChatGPT.

Genuine question, do you actually use the formal emdash in your writing? AIs are very consistent about using the proper emdash—a double long dash with no spaces around it, whereas humans almost always tend to use a slang version - a single dash with spaces around it. That's because most keyboards don't have an emdash key, and few people even know how to produce an actual emdash. That's what makes it such a good givea…

Nah, I've been using them correctly for years. My preference for them came by way of reading a lot in generally, but especially from Salinger.

I do them without surrounding spaces, because that's... how you're supposed to use them, and it's also less typing.

They also used to be a really good Shibboleth to tell if someone was using a Mac—the key combo on there is easy, and also easy to remember, so Mac users were far more likely than the median to employ em-dashes. It wasn't a sure tell, but it was pretty reliable.

Re: Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech

#337
post #228
post #148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good. It's a crutch for poorly composed sentences or for prose intending to imitate the affect of poorly composed sentences. There's not a single sentence under the sun that needs an emdash. Commas and parentheses can do it all, and an excess of either is a sign of poorly edited prose. I don't buy the pro-clanker pro-em dash movement that has come out of nowhere in the past several years.

> prose intending to imitate the affect of poorly composed sentences Anyone who makes errors like this should not be talking.

What's the error? I'd hyphenate "poorly-composed" (most wouldn't these days, but they can go to hell) and I think it's a bit too wordy for what it's communicating, but I don't see what I'd call an actual error.

I would personally avoid writing that "poorly composed sentences" have an "affect"—rather than the writer having or presenting an affect, or the sentences' tone being affected—as I find an implied anthropomorphizing of "sentences" in that usage, which anthropomorphizing isn't serving enough useful purpose, to my eye, that I'd want it in my writing, but I'm not sure I'd call that an error either.

What did you mean?

> Commas and parentheses can do it all, and an excess of either is a sign of poorly edited prose.

This attitude, however, is a disease of modern English literacy.

Re: Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech

#338
post #14
post #7

I intentionally put spelling mistakes in my doc to let others know I'm not using ChatGPT. What a time to be alive in which small spelling or grammar mistake is a good sign of authenticity.

Same. Also, when asked for anonymity at work, I usually make mistakes that do not correspond to my native tongue (let’s say I’m french and working in an international company. I would write comments in a supposedly anonymous survey like “He ist like…” to camouflage myself as german). It’s so easy to trick everyone. People who doesn’t do that is just too lazy. In slack, you cannot just copy paste a two-paragraph answe…

Common sense would say that if you're writing a long message, you should draft it in a better editor than a chat program.

Re: Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech

#339
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"The Dwarves tell no tale; but even as mithril was the foundation of their wealth, so also it was their destruction: they delved too greedily and too deep, and disturbed that from which they fled, Durin's Bane" - J.R.R. Tolkien spoken by Gandalf, 1954

Thank you! I remember the movies almost word-for-word, but I don't have a copy of the books anymore (I should fix that!)

I think I’ve read them 25-30 times, mostly when I was a kid, couldn’t help myself. :)
Post reply on HN