Performance and telemetry analysis of Trae IDE, ByteDance's VSCode fork

Post by viraptor » Mon, Jul 28, 2025, 11:58 AM UTC

63stack wrote: post #326

viraptor wrote: post #323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think you understand what I mean with the language aware rename. It's not even close to %s. Let's say I've got a c# app and I rename a class in VS. This will rename the class in the file, all class usages (but not as text - if I rename A.B, then it will not touch X.B due to different namespaces), including other projects in the solution, optionally will rename the file it lives in and optionally will/won't re…

This is something that the LSP provides (even in VScode), and is available in nvim yes. The command is vim.lsp.buf.rename(), and it is bound to "grn" by default. https://neovim.io/doc/user/lsp.html#vim.lsp.buf.rename () (HN seems to not link the () part, you have to add it yourself) All the other similar fanciness like renaming a file and automatically updating module references is also provided by the LSP, and is al…

Post by nottorp » Mon, Jul 28, 2025, 12:58 PM UTC

maven29 wrote: post #308

ipaddr wrote: post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would not want to share these: Unique Identifiers: Machine ID, user ID, device fingerprints Workspace Details: Project information, file paths (obfuscated) Plus os details. I'd rather none.

How do you do abuse detection for free-tier without these?

Post by duped » Mon, Jul 28, 2025, 1:58 PM UTC

dmitrygr wrote: post #265

duped wrote: post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

gcc/as/ld are batch processors from the GNU toolchain that offer few (if any) features beyond basic C/C++ (and a handful of other languages) as support, and they're non-standard toolchains on 2 out of 3 major operating systems requiring a bit of heavy lifting to use. It's kind of nonsense to bring them up in this conversation.

And electron is standard tooling? LOL

Post by naikrovek » Mon, Jul 28, 2025, 4:02 PM UTC

tonyhart7 wrote: post #269

user3939382 wrote: post #228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't want any program on my computer including the OS to make any network calls whatsoever unless they're directly associated with executing GUI/CLI interactions I have currently undertaken as the user. Any exception should be opt-in. IMHO the entire Overton window of these remote communications is in the wrong place.

Yeah but this is industry standard not saying this is good but everyone do this

Post by Y_Y » Mon, Jul 28, 2025, 4:38 PM UTC

maven29 wrote: post #308

ipaddr wrote: post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would not want to share these: Unique Identifiers: Machine ID, user ID, device fingerprints Workspace Details: Project information, file paths (obfuscated) Plus os details. I'd rather none.

How do you do abuse detection for free-tier without these?