Live data from Hacker News

A Typology of Canadianisms

dchp.arts.ubc.ca

331–340 of 345 posts

Re: A Typology of Canadianisms

#331

"brown toast". When ordering breakfast, such as eggs and toast. "You want white or brown toast?" Since most toast is toasted to a brown tone, the question confuses Americans (west-coast, anyways). It's really the question: white bread toast or whole-wheat bread toast?

I asked an American family if they wanted brown or white bread, they looked confused and said "we want BREAD"

Re: A Typology of Canadianisms

#332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quebec has it's own dictionary.

And Quebec has it’s own English. I spent a few years working in Montreal and soon learned about “passing the vacuum” and “closing the light”. There are so many bilingual folks that concepts and word orders flow back and forth. I had an interesting discussion with a bilingual anglophone about how in English elsewhere it’s called a “pacifier” and not a “souce”

really? its called a soother where I live

Re: A Typology of Canadianisms

#333

Seems very thorough. I don't see "transport" or "transport truck" though. I think It's an Ontario expression and it sounds kind of weird to me as an Albertan.

Never here that term used but I'm out west as well. We're all semi's, all the time. "two-four" is there and can confirm that is more an eastern term as well. Never heard the term until I spent a year out in Ontario many years ago. Still hasn't really made its way to the west in all that time.

two-four has been established MB parlance for at least 50 years. But then MB isn't really Western Canada. Its central.

Re: A Typology of Canadianisms

#334
post #81

I have a sure fire method for detecting Canadians out in the wild. Pay close attention to how they pronounce the word “resources”. If you hear the letter Z in there then they are probably Canadian.

Most people who refer to "North Americans" collectively are Canadian. People in the US can forget Canada exists. People in Canada can't forget the US exist and so they need a term that includes both.

? Americans refer to the continent as "North America."

Re: A Typology of Canadianisms

#335
post #61

I always loved the term "keener" growing up and was disappointed that it wasn't a term of use down here in the States. It's essentially the same thing as a "brown-noser" but a little less graphic.

Keener is more benign than brown-noser, but Canadians will use it with a subtle hint of irony or sarcasm to indicate politely that the "keener' is indeed a brown-noser or amusing try hard.

Re: A Typology of Canadianisms

#337
post #296
post #167

Well, why not include the word "Canadian", which significantly predates the country, as the prime example? It's derived from Iroquois Nation words and used by French settlers to refer to Indigenous people. The word "Canada" was used by explorer Jacques Cartier to refer to the city now called "Québec". It broadly refered to the territory of a specific Indigenous tribe. (could be derogatory, but seemingly accurate / ma…

> For anyone interested in Canadian history, always check-out the French version of a wikipedia page In reading about Canadian history this entire comment strikes me as very "East" biased? (Because I'm reading a strong implication that the French are the true holders of the history and the English just showed up later. Which may very well be true) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_alienation

It is true from the Quebec to Manitoba (about the French), but not west of that. The East Coast provinces are more complicated with their own histories.

Re: A Typology of Canadianisms

#338
post #296

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> For anyone interested in Canadian history, always check-out the French version of a wikipedia page In reading about Canadian history this entire comment strikes me as very "East" biased? (Because I'm reading a strong implication that the French are the true holders of the history and the English just showed up later. Which may very well be true) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_alienation

> I'm reading a strong implication that the French are the true holders of the history I interpreted this more as "don't forget to check out the French-language Wikipedia articles too, since they might have contents that are absent from the English-language Wikipedia articles." This would likely be the case for anything concerning Québécois or Acadien culture, or the early settlements by the French; but not likely fo…

Historically speaking, it is the case for Manitoba. Manitoba was founded by French speakers and Winnipeg should be a majority Metis city today. The reason it isn't is because of repression from Ottawa and anglophones. See the Manitoba Schools question and the history of Louis Riel and the Metis treaties.

Re: A Typology of Canadianisms

#339
post #279

I wish they would've explained the term "soaker" a bit better as it's such a Canadian thing. Basically, when the snow starts to melt in the spring, you'll sometimes accidentally step on some thin ice that leads directly to a puddle underneath and soak your boot. It sucks! Also, we would often call these "booters" in Manitoba, where I'm from.

first time i’ve found a fellow manitoban on HN greetings !

We are here, were everywhere!

Re: A Typology of Canadianisms

#340

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www.crosbys.com/sarahs-molasses-brown-bread/ It’s made with ungodly amounts of molasses. My grandmother used to make it with lard or shortening, yikes.

Molasses has a lot of minerals in it, and the notion that eating fat makes you fat is a lie purpitrated by big sugar/grain that has lead to a lot of diabetes and heart desease, your grandmother knew where it was at! Also Big Sugar is an underrated band from Canada IMO

That isn’t just fat, it’s heavily saturated fat. Lard in particular is nasty stuff.

And yeah molasses has minerals in it … and a ton of sugar. It’s no health food.

I’ve loaded up on this stuff as a kid. You’re basically eating cake. That’s fine for a treat, not for eating every day.

Post reply on HN