Live data from Hacker News

The Fed says this is a cube of $1M. They're off by half a million

calvin.sh

331–340 of 578 posts

Re: The Fed says this is a cube of $1M. They're off by half a million

#331
post #288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Takes longer for some than others. Depends on your job title.

I'd say a small (single digit) percentage of people are able to accumulate $1.5 million over "a few" (2-3) years of working, but maybe I'm out of touch.

Maybe a tenth of a percent unless we’re pretty generous with “few”. Which I sometimes am! If I ate a few cookies it was probably more than two.

Re: The Fed says this is a cube of $1M. They're off by half a million

#332
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is yet another link to an app that doesn't do what the author of the post actually specified.

The post specifically says there's not a tool for counting red dots on an image, and there absolutely are. From the side-counts, you still have to extrapolate to a volume, but a specific highlighted sub-problem is well addressed by apps.

> The post specifically says there's not a tool for counting red dots on an image

Oh really? Is that what it says? Let's take a look:

> All I wanted was a way to click on things in a photo and have the number go up.

Those are the requirements. That's what the app is supposed to do.

I don't see "a tool for counting red dots" anywhere. The closest thing is this passage:

> It's stupidly simple: upload an image, click to drop a dot, and it tells you how many you've placed[…] But somehow, nothing like it existed.

You linked to an app that places its own markers (by way of ML) and then gives you a count of those—not a count of the ones that you put down. That so obviously fails the requirements.

Re: The Fed says this is a cube of $1M. They're off by half a million

#333
post #288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Takes longer for some than others. Depends on your job title.

I'd say a small (single digit) percentage of people are able to accumulate $1.5 million over "a few" (2-3) years of working, but maybe I'm out of touch.

I would have thought a few meant 3 to 5, although I still agree that the number of people who could do it is small.

Re: The Fed says this is a cube of $1M. They're off by half a million

#334
post #192

Kind of off-topic, but I've always thought a good way to suss out what sort of background somebody comes from is to ask them to visualise $1million dollars. People from a "working class" background tend to see a massive pile of money, more middle class, a smaller pile, upper class maybe a cheque or a small stack of $100 bills or a bank transfer. It's maybe one of the weirdest parts of the JBR ransom note (getting rea…

What is the background of someone who visualizes Scrooge McDuck diving into a pool of doubloons?

Re: The Fed says this is a cube of $1M. They're off by half a million

#335
post #239

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Maybe it's easy for the Fed to acquire more cash as long as it's guaranteed not to be spent. The Fed doesn't acquire cash, it creates it. USD banknotes are liabilities of the Fed, but that concept only makes sense when somebody other than itself owns them.

No. We have a double accounting system. For every $1 it creates, it has to create an equivalent liability. And when something is budgeted for $1 Million, it is $1m nothing more nothing less

I’m certain there’s policy that allows for national mint to create non-spendable exemplars of currency in a way that does not count as cash.

Re: The Fed says this is a cube of $1M. They're off by half a million

#336
This guy could have pulled the greatest heist in the history of mankind. Steal the cube, take out $500K, leave $1 million inside (fluff it up a bit or put some Styrofoam in the center), then return the cube, saying it was a stunt to draw attention to climate change or similar and you intended to return it. Then they would count the dollars, you'd get a minor sentence (maybe)... Then you get to keep $500k.

Re: The Fed says this is a cube of $1M. They're off by half a million

#337
post #309

Kind of off-topic, but I've always wondered. When you use a card to get cash in $20 bills from an ATM, does it record the serial# of every bill it pumps out to you?

Such scanners exist but most ATMs do not have them. Of course if you fill the ATM with a stack of fresh bills you know the serial numbers for, and you know how many bills were dispensed prior to a particular transaction, you should know which bills got dispensed during that transaction. Of course the tracking of this information down to that level would be pretty pointless. The moment someone breaks a 20 the connecti…

> tracking of this information down to that level would be pretty pointless

Maybe pretty pointfull tracking shadow economy. When Bob sells moonlight stuff his clients will more often than not simply go to the ATM, withdraw the sum and hand it to him. Bob will then buy at shop with big bill. Shop owner will deposit bill at bank..

Re: The Fed says this is a cube of $1M. They're off by half a million

#338

Instead of writing the counting tool he could have used the Multi-Point Tool in ImageJ [1] [2]. I used it just this morning for counting some embryos I collected. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhFNiPsVRoM [2] https://fiji.sc/

Being a web tool is significantly lower friction. I will definitely look into self hosting a version of this I can use in the future.

Here you go: https://ij.imjoy.io/

Re: The Fed says this is a cube of $1M. They're off by half a million

#339
post #320
post #208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

JBR = JonBenet Ramsey https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Killing_of_JonBen...

Separate comment so you can separately downvote/flag me: Why , OP, why ? How much self-awareness does it really take to realize JBR is a non-standard acronym people won't recognize? It almost feels like a superpower that I take an extra half-second to think about what jargon the average person needs to have defined.

Reading the OP, it appears they were pretty much blurting out a semi-nonsensical stream of consciousness. That's my best guess as to why they didn't bother to define JBR, because in reality, they weren't writing for any other audience other than themselves.

Re: The Fed says this is a cube of $1M. They're off by half a million

#340

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There was a danish artist that got a very large amount of cash to do a similar in spirit artwork. He then named it “take the money and run” and showcased what amounted to an empty frame.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take_the_Money_and_Run_(artwor...

This is so unbelievably funny. Thank you for sharing!
Post reply on HN