Live data from Hacker News

Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

apple.com

331–340 of 514 posts

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#331
post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was musing before sleep days ago about how maybe the internet still is just a fad. We’ve had a few decades of it, yeah, but maybe in the future people will look at it as boring tech just like I viewed VCRs or phones when I was growing up. Maybe we’re still addicted to the novelty of it, but in the future it fades into the background of life. I’ve read stories about how people were amazed at calling each other and w…

A few years ago I would've said you were incredibly cynical, but nowadays with so much AI slop around social media and just tonnes of bad content I tend to agree with you. Now the Cyberpunk pen and paper RPG seems prophetic if turn your head sideways a bit https://chatgpt.com/share/684762cc-9024-800e-9460-d5da3236cd...

I think younger me would think the same. Its not even the AI slop or bad content but also the intrusive tracking, data collection, and the commercialization of interests. I just feel gross participating.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#332

Apple's integration of AI into its MacOS is the one reason why I am considering a switch back to Linux after my current laptop dies.

With a single toggle, you can turn off Apple Intelligence See (System) Settings

But I can't toggle off downloading it, which is 2GB on my limited connection and 2GB of MY disk space.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FWIW, here are the repos for the CLI tool [1] and backend [2]. Looks like it is indeed VM-based container support (as opposed to WSLv1-style syscall translation or whatever): Containerization provides APIs to: [...] - Create an optimized Linux kernel for fast boot times. - Spawn lightweight virtual machines. - Manage the runtime environment of virtual machines. [1] https://github.com/apple/container [2] https://githu…

WSLv1 never supported a native docker (AFAIK, perhaps I'm wrong?) That said, I'd think apple would actually be much better positioned to try the WSL1 approach. I'd assume apple OS is a lot closer to linux than windows is.

Yeah, it probably would be feasible to dust off the FreeBSD Linux compatibility layer[1] and turn that into native support for Linux apps on Mac.

I think Apple’s main hesitation would be that the Linux userland is all GPL.

[1]: https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/linuxemu/

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#334
post #173
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This reads like the crotchety and persnickety 60-somethings in the 1990's who said the internet was a passing and annoying fad.

It is impossible to have a negative opinion of AI without silly comments like this just one step removed from calling you a boomer or a Luddite. Yes all technological progress is good and if you don’t agree you’re a dumb hick. AI maximalists are like those 100 years ago that put radium everywhere, even in toothpaste, because new things are cool and we’re so smart you need to trust us they won’t cause any harm. I’ll k…

I am a Luddite, but I think that's a good thing. I don't mind the negative comments at all. I get them all the time.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#335

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find it offensive to have any generative AI code on my computer. Settings → Apple Intelligence and Siri → toggle Apple Intelligence off. It's not enabled by default. But in case you accidentally turned it on, turning it off gets you a bunch of disk space back as the AI stuff is removed from the OS. Some people are just looking for a reason to be offended.

The theatrics of being *forced* to use completely optional, opt-in features has been a staple of discussions regarding Apple for years. Every year, macOS and iPadOS look superficially more and more similar, but they remain distinct in their interfaces, features, etc. But the past 15 years have been "we'll be *forced* to only use Apple-vetted software, just like the App Store!" And yeah, the Gatekeeper mechanism got l…

Not forced to use, forced to download and waste 2GB of disk space.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#337

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You're either fully locked in, or fully on your own. I'm not sure what you mean by that. You can trivially root a Pixel factory image. And if you're talking about how they will punish you for that by removing certain features: Apple does that too (but to a lesser extent). https://github.com/cormiertyshawn895/RecordingIndicatorUtili...

On Android devices with AVB (so basically everything nowadays), once the bootloader is unlocked, so many things already either lock you out or degrade your service in various ways. For example, Netflix will downgrade you to 480p, Google Pay will stop working, many apps will just straight up disappear from the Play Store because SafetyNet will stop passing (especially on newer devices with hardware attestation), banki…

Out of interest, are you currently using android (or fork) or iOS?

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#338
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand why my MacBook doesn't have a touchscreen. I'm switching to an iPad Pro tomorrow. I use Superwhisper to talk to it 90% of the time anyway.

My theory is because of the hinge, which is a common point of failure on laptops. Either you are putting extra strain on it by having someone constantly touching the screen, and some users just mash their fingers into touch screens. Or users want a fully openable screen to mimic a tablet format, and those hinges always seem to fail quicker. Every touchscreen laptop I've had eventually has had the hinge fail.

There seems to be some kind of incompatibility between antiglare and oleophobic coatings that may also contribute.

Every single touch screen laptop I’ve seen has huge reflection issues, practically being mirrors. My assumption is that in order for the screen to not get nasty with fingerprints in no time, touchscreen laptops need oleophobic coating, but to add that they have to use no antiglare coating.

Personally I wouldn’t touch my screen often enough to justify having to contend with glare.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#339

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The new windowing feature basically cannibalizes MacBook Air.

A Macbook Air is cheaper than an iPad Pro with a keyboard though. Not to mention you still can't run apps from outside the app store, and most of these new features we're hoping work as well as they do on MacOS, but given that background tasks had to be an API, I doubt they will.

iPad+keyboard is also awkwardly top heavy and not very well suited for lap use. That might cease to be an issue with sufficiently dense batteries bringing down the weight of the iPad though.

Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc

#340
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What about macOS being derived from BSD? Isn’t that where containers came from: BSD jails? I know the container ecosystem largely targets Linux just curious what people’s thoughts are on that.

BSD jails are architected wholly differently from what something like Docker provides. Jails are first-class citizens that are baked deep into the system. A tool like Docker relies using multiple Linux features/tools to assemble/create isolation. Additionally, iirc, the logic for FreeBSD jails never made it into the Darwin kernel. Someone correct me please.

> BSD jails are architected wholly differently from what something like Docker provides. > Jails are first-class citizens that are baked deep into the system.

Both very true statements and worth remembering when considering:

> Additionally, iirc, the logic for FreeBSD jails never made it into the Darwin kernel.

You are quite correct, as Darwin is is based on XNU[0], which itself has roots in the Mach[1] microkernel. Since XNU[0] is an entirely different OS architecture than that of FreeBSD[3], jails[4] do not exist within it.

The XNU source can be found here[2].

0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XNU

1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach_(kernel)

2 - https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/xnu

3 - https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/

4 - https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=jail&apropos=0&sek...

Post reply on HN