Live data from Hacker News

On Not Carrying a Camera – Cultivating memories instead of snapshots

hedgehogreview.com

331–333 of 333 posts

Re: On Not Carrying a Camera – Cultivating memories instead of snapshots

#331

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As I've grown older, my main regret is not having spent time with people i wanted to. Photographs have never come up. Perhaps it's because I've always disliked it and looked down on people who killed moments by trying to immortalize them. The photos at best act as a trigger to remember but in a very limited way. And being a photographer i think really does alter your way of looking at things imo for the worse.

> And being a photographer i think really does alter your way of looking at things imo for the worse. Curious why you believe this? Personally, my experience of the world expanded significantly when I bought a camera in my early 30s. It forced me to notice things I’d never noticed before. It trained me to open my awareness. It helped me see more beauty, experience more awe, and become more attuned to the environments…

I guess I'm viewing this through my own personal experiences and world view. Everyone I've seen who's a compulsive photographer doesn't have this heightened awareness for details. Instead, they're, at best, people who know how to manipulate a "scene" to get a better photo.

The thing is that every thing in the real world is a photo subject for them rather than an experience. And i think the deeper down the hole they go, the less they realise this.

I had not factored in conditions like aphantasia into my thoughts and in that context, i can agree that it would be useful but i imagine that it's not a very common condition so it's an outlier?

For many people I've met, the first time they see something, it's through their phone/camera because they don't want to "miss the moment". I'd rather let it linger in my head as a memory and age.

I can't take disagree with your point of view but i think it's mostly because our experiences are so different.

Re: On Not Carrying a Camera – Cultivating memories instead of snapshots

#332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is old advice, I remember it being framed as "if I wanted a picture of a monument I'd buy a postcard", and postcards basically no longer exist. It made some sense to take pictures of panoramas or art when you could show something to people that could not see it otherwise, but in this era it makes no sense (unless you enjoy photography as a hobby). A goofy picture of you kissing some old bronze statue? Dumb, but…

Turns out that the things I wish I'd taken photos of were: bookshelves (with titles visible), crappy old computers and things on the screen, posters I used to have on the wall, my everyday clothes, streets with parked cars, the inside of an art supply store. These are not achievements, or unusual places, or humans. The things I'd like to see are stores of subtle cultural information than gets lost because it seems un…

Photographs of shelves of VHS tapes, books, and TTRPGs from childhood, and the homes of relatives are what I value above a lot of other photos. I had one of the earliest digital cameras, but the photos survived many data losses, and finally being of an age to appreciate a favourite book of a long-deceased relative is unspeakably special.

Re: On Not Carrying a Camera – Cultivating memories instead of snapshots

#333
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Having a knee-jerk reaction to photo taking that causes you to stop taking photos entirely is absurd. Note that the author is a photographer by trade.

Note that the author stopped carrying a camera with him in his hometown, in order to "live in the moment", as per the article. My point was made generically.

The word “entirely” was what I was pointing out. The photographer stopped bringing his work home.
Post reply on HN