This is also how the legendary ”Magic Eye” books were supposed to be viewed. Not by crossing the eyes.
I've acquired a new superpower
331–340 of 583 posts
Re: I've acquired a new superpower
#332Re: I've acquired a new superpower
#333Re: I've acquired a new superpower
#334Re: I've acquired a new superpower
#335Earlier quoted context omitted.
To reduce eye strain, don’t cross your eyes, but relax them (so, the other way). Instantly clear and snaps together as if magnetic.
This is called “divergence” [1] and is less straining on your eyes than crossing them (“convergence” [2]) while being equally as effective spotting differences, even on video. It’s also what your eyes naturally do when you watch stereoscopic 3D with tinted glasses—the stereoscopic images are pulled out (divergence) not pushed in (convergence/cross-eyed). I’ve been doing this since I childhood. If you get good at it,…
Re: I've acquired a new superpower
#336Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wrote a paper about doing this using human eyes as the "repeating pattern" (either someone else's, or your own in a mirror): https://philpapers.org/archive/ALEDSK.pdf ...You can use this trick to make boring meetings or conversations mildly more amusing (but be careful not to look like a clown crossing your eyes). If you're an expert at this, you can even do it to your own hands. Hold both hands in front of you but…
If you're distant enough / the people are sitting close enough, you can stereogram two people's faces together. You usually only get fleeting moments of crispness when their heads are aligned correctly though.
Re: I've acquired a new superpower
#337Re: I've acquired a new superpower
#338Well I'll be the one to say this blew my mind. somehow creating the third middle image, being able to relax my eyes and even scan around this composite image actually made me giggle out loud on my laptop, a very rare occurrence. Thank you to the author.
Re: I've acquired a new superpower
#339Re: I've acquired a new superpower
#340Examples include:
1. Delaying the left or right channel by a few ms (Haas effect).
2. De-tuning one of the channels by a few cents
3. Boosting an EQ band on one channel, with a complimentary cut on the opposite channel.
...and many more.
These are usually very subtle changes that our stereoscopic ears have no problem detecting.
In any case, when we need to do some forensic searching for possible differences between two near-identical channels we'll invert the polarity on one channel and then sum them. The resulting delta sticks out like a sore thumb and highlights even then tiniest differences between the files.
So it's fascinating to discover that we can easily do something similar with our eyes to find the differences.