Earlier quoted context omitted.
They’re also incredibly non-diverse and complain about big tech being non-diverse.
“Incredibly non-diverse”? No. They are in a better position than most https://www.nytco.com/2023-new-york-times-diversity-and-incl... The my don’t complain about tech being non-diverse, they report that it is non-diverse - which is true.
New York Times tech workers union votes to authorize a strike
331–340 of 675 posts
Re: New York Times tech workers union votes to authorize a strike
#332Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then, like gaming or Hollywood, their salaries will be lower.
Maybe the New York Times will end up both with a unionized tech workforce, and a lower-paid one. Personally, I would never want to join a union or work as management at a company with a union, but I am still kind of curious to see what the result of a tech workforce unionizing would be.
Re: New York Times tech workers union votes to authorize a strike
#333Re: New York Times tech workers union votes to authorize a strike
#334Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because dei and the nyt focus on that being important.
[flagged]
It does seem that way, slightly. There seem to be some natural causes for misalignment that I would think are more influential. One main issue is that different people and groups of people have different experiences. If you've never been screwed over, you might not see the problems in the current system. If you have been screwed over and seen other screwed over, you might just think that's the way it goes.
What are the alternatives proposed to the unfair impacts? I want to see the objective rating criteria that can reduce or prevent people from getting screwed over. I do think tech unions can help with this a little, but I haven't seen any successful approaches to things like ratings. Even the places that set standards seem to have subjective criteria, or you work is subjectively applied.
I've been screwed over and passed over multiple times. I also have a disability, no less it's one that causes inconsistencies with policies and treatment to jump out to me. I still haven't seen any solutions that will work until the members agree on what are the problems and how do we fix them. Many of my coworkers think my company is great, but those also tend to be the people that consistently get high ratings and promotions. Meanwhile, I struggle to point out all the contributions I made, align them to the standard, and otherwise do my manager's job of rating me for them only to get an average rating. It also doesn't help that I have to tell them what the corporate policies say when they try to misuse them against me (holding time off against me, holding prior period performance against me for this period, not providing accommodations that were promised, etc). Nobody else seems to have this hard of a time so why would they risk anything to speak up for people like me? I've learned to live with the disappointment by giving up any dreams of advancement and just trying to keep the job I have while fending off as much BS as I can... and perhaps complaining about it on HN.
Re: New York Times tech workers union votes to authorize a strike
#335Earlier quoted context omitted.
They’re also incredibly non-diverse and complain about big tech being non-diverse.
Always the same story... A few years ago a big left French newspaper (Libération) always pushing for "diversity" published a photo of their staff, which was like 98- 100% white.
Re: New York Times tech workers union votes to authorize a strike
#336Highly talented software engineers are still hard to find. If you find one, pay them well and do everything you can to retain them.
There is now far more devs than there is work for them. This is a planned strategy to reduce salaries.
If you're "talented". Make your money and get out asap.
Re: New York Times tech workers union votes to authorize a strike
#337Highly talented software engineers are still hard to find. If you find one, pay them well and do everything you can to retain them.
Re: New York Times tech workers union votes to authorize a strike
#338Re: New York Times tech workers union votes to authorize a strike
#339Highly talented software engineers are still hard to find. If you find one, pay them well and do everything you can to retain them.
This is because software dev is a volatile market. It doesn't matter how "talented" you are, it's about your rank in the social circles and it shows in the product. There is now far more devs than there is work for them. This is a planned strategy to reduce salaries. If you're "talented". Make your money and get out asap.
Re: New York Times tech workers union votes to authorize a strike
#340Highly talented software engineers are still hard to find. If you find one, pay them well and do everything you can to retain them.
This is because software dev is a volatile market. It doesn't matter how "talented" you are, it's about your rank in the social circles and it shows in the product. There is now far more devs than there is work for them. This is a planned strategy to reduce salaries. If you're "talented". Make your money and get out asap.