Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is this getting downvoted? They're right that the criticism is pretty excessive: "Maybe his next article will be about how airlines should speak Esperanto because English is such a flawed language. That’s a clever and unique observation." Hm.
I got a little snarky but I think the analogy holds. Esperanto is a superior language to English. And English has many flaws. Theoretically it would be better to have all pilots and airports learn an efficient language. But it would be stupid and immature to seriously write a blog post about that, especially without talking about all the flaws in that plan.
At least one one perspective, English is superior. That perspective is that you can actually use it in almost any modern situation because it has been tried and tested globally.