Live data from Hacker News

Bard is now Gemini, and we’re rolling out a mobile app and Gemini Advanced

blog.google

331–340 of 1001 posts

Re: Bard is now Gemini, and we’re rolling out a mobile app and Gemini Advanced

#332
post #13

FYI for any Googlers - On the "Sorry, Gemini advanced isn't available for you" page, clicking "Learn More" gives you a (presumably internal) SSO sign-on (links to https://support.corp.google.com/googleone?ai_premium )

Thanks for the heads up -- which page was this from?

Re: Bard is now Gemini, and we’re rolling out a mobile app and Gemini Advanced

#333
post #303

Did I get this right? Bard – old name of their generative AI service, to be called Gemini Duet AI – old name for their generative AI in Google Workspace, to be called Gemini Gemini – three things: 1. the name of their models (like GPT). 2. the new name of their free service (like ChatGPT), gives access to Pro 1.0 but not Ultra 1.0. 3. the new name of the Generative AI tools in Google Workspace. Gemini Advanced – the…

bard(RIP) was powered by gemini which was powered by palm2 or something, which was powered by deepmind which was powered by google which was powered by alphabet or sth Let s hope the name sticks for more than 2 months

and previously they were called lamda and meena..

Re: Bard is now Gemini, and we’re rolling out a mobile app and Gemini Advanced

#334

Did I get this right? Bard – old name of their generative AI service, to be called Gemini Duet AI – old name for their generative AI in Google Workspace, to be called Gemini Gemini – three things: 1. the name of their models (like GPT). 2. the new name of their free service (like ChatGPT), gives access to Pro 1.0 but not Ultra 1.0. 3. the new name of the Generative AI tools in Google Workspace. Gemini Advanced – the…

It’s sad that a company of very smart people can’t figure out coherent naming.

Can you imagine Apple causing confusion like this? I know it’s not a like-for-like comparison, but everything Apple does it seems like they have a grand strategy that’s clear for everyone to see. Things build up in a modular way to fit a big puzzle.

Google, on the other hand, constantly makes up things on an ad hoc basis.

Re: Bard is now Gemini, and we’re rolling out a mobile app and Gemini Advanced

#335
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Proof of Gemini cheating: https://i.imgur.com/eYJDFjS.png Answer about cherries falling from the sky... (there is no question or context beforehand, this is the first question of the chat)

That's a bummer. I just made this one up which GPT-4 failed and Gemini got right but definitely need to do more testing to see what's being taken from online and what is actual reasoning. https://i.imgur.com/3sNr3LW.png https://i.imgur.com/EIj0nZg.png Edit: When I did your prompt it got it right on the first try fwiwi https://i.imgur.com/E3zYEca.png

Gemini happened to get the yes/no answer right, but the reasoning it gave is completely wrong, so it should not get any credit for it.

Re: Bard is now Gemini, and we’re rolling out a mobile app and Gemini Advanced

#336

Did I get this right? Bard – old name of their generative AI service, to be called Gemini Duet AI – old name for their generative AI in Google Workspace, to be called Gemini Gemini – three things: 1. the name of their models (like GPT). 2. the new name of their free service (like ChatGPT), gives access to Pro 1.0 but not Ultra 1.0. 3. the new name of the Generative AI tools in Google Workspace. Gemini Advanced – the…

You should check out the rabbit hole of Google's various payment systems/apps. GPay, Google Pay, Google Wallet, Android Pay, etc.

All the different the ways those brands (and more?) were used to describe multiple services and apps that had wildly different capabilities, sometimes varying by region, with several instances of them bringing back a previously used name for something completely different.

Re: Bard is now Gemini, and we’re rolling out a mobile app and Gemini Advanced

#337

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Question for you - > better at incorporating search results in its answer vs gpt-4 bing How are you getting it to incorporate search results in its answers? I can't for the life of me get it to find any real-time external data except for the 5 official 'extensions' under settings, which are for Flights/Hotels/Maps/Workspace/YouTube. Did you mean that, or have you found a workaround to get Bard to actually search on G…

I got it quickly with the question: > what is the difference between polyptyton and antaclanasis

I just tried this but it doesn't indicate it searched the web. (On Gemini mobile app on android).

Re: Bard is now Gemini, and we’re rolling out a mobile app and Gemini Advanced

#338

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini Imagine looking at all those things named Gemini and thinking "let's name our system Gemini!".

What is Gemini referencing here in Google’s case? What twins are making the AI?

Re: Bard is now Gemini, and we’re rolling out a mobile app and Gemini Advanced

#339
post #334

Did I get this right? Bard – old name of their generative AI service, to be called Gemini Duet AI – old name for their generative AI in Google Workspace, to be called Gemini Gemini – three things: 1. the name of their models (like GPT). 2. the new name of their free service (like ChatGPT), gives access to Pro 1.0 but not Ultra 1.0. 3. the new name of the Generative AI tools in Google Workspace. Gemini Advanced – the…

It’s sad that a company of very smart people can’t figure out coherent naming. Can you imagine Apple causing confusion like this? I know it’s not a like-for-like comparison, but everything Apple does it seems like they have a grand strategy that’s clear for everyone to see. Things build up in a modular way to fit a big puzzle. Google, on the other hand, constantly makes up things on an ad hoc basis.

All the non programming intelligence in a place like Google likely goes into figuring out how to protect and expand one's turf, which will explain this emblematic mess.

Re: Bard is now Gemini, and we’re rolling out a mobile app and Gemini Advanced

#340

Gemini Ultra seems better on logic than GPT4. Still messing around testing but here's a prompt Ultra nailed but GPT4 completely botched: Tabitha likes cookies but not cake. She likes mutton but not lamb, and she likes okra but not squash. Following the same rule, will she like cherries or pears https://i.imgur.com/KW6gQbc.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/OSHSvLp.png

If we want to test these beasts in logic, we should probably start using actual formalized logic, rather than English. In just one test, Gemini flopped hard, while GPT-4-Turbo nailed it. Here is my prompt: Below is a well-typed CoC function: foo : ∀(P: Nat -> *) ∀(s: ∀{n} -> ∀(x: (P n)) -> (P (n + 1))) ∀(z: (P 0)) (P 3) = λP λs λz (s (s (s z))) Below is an incomplete CoC function: foo : ∀(P: Nat -> *) ∀(f: ∀{n} -> ∀(…

This isn't representative of real-world usage since you don't let it think.
Post reply on HN