Live data from Hacker News

AI real-time human full-body photo generator

generated.photos

331–340 of 421 posts

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#331
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

my first attempt created some kind of gym monster lol https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e64a2f412bec0009b...

This is actually an incredible example of "The longer you look the worse it gets". She has a second set of boobs where her hips should be! That's not evolutionarily advantageous!

> That's not evolutionarily advantageous!

Although not my kind of thing, I'm pretty sure some people would select for that (in real life) if given the option. ;)

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#332

I get that most of these are hilarious (this is my favorite comment on HN in some time, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37239909 ). But still, I find this incredibly frightening. These are only going to get better. Does anyone doubt that in a couple years time (if that) we'll be able to put the image of any known public person into whatever generated photo we want, which would be indistinguishable from reality?…

We're basically there right now betweem Deepnude[1] and Photoshop. [1] (NSFW, seriously.) https://deepnude.cc/

Doesn't seem to actually be a thing though, as they seem to require a US$100 payment up front in order to actually "generate" an image.

That's pretty much the behaviour of a scam website.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#333

Wow, the "one more click" effect is strong with that one... I did not expect anything useful to come out of experimenting with this, yet here I still am half an hour later. Congrats to the makers, it's impressive!

Doesn’t seem nearly as good as a decent SDXL finetune. Or even SD 1.5, really.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#335
post #9

If you're wondering how it's so fast and cheap and they can generate variants so easily, it's because they're using GANs (see the footer). GANs are way faster than diffusion models because they generate the image in a single forward pass and their true latent space encoding makes editing a breeze. (And if you're wondering how it can look so good when 'everyone knows GANs don't work because they're too unstable', a wi…

Trying it out just now, it's still getting major anatomical features wrong, and hands/fingers are still a noticeable problem.

eg (NSFW!): https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e741e6c4c0f80009e...

Wrong number of limbs, wrong number of fingers on hands, etc.

The result is ok sometimes, but that's probably only about 5% of the time. Here's a decent result (very NSFW) without immediately noticeable deformities:

https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e7590e482612000b1...

Probably 95% of the images generated so far have been clearly deformed though.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#337
post #329

What datasets do people use for applications like these? Seems like you'd want huge amounts of photos of people (abundant publicly, though not necessarily free for use) with huge amounts of tagging for assorted clothes, body styles, accessories, nationalities, scene types (arduous?).

A lot of the tagging, from what I understand, comes from image recognition that detects some of that stuff. For the clothes you could just scrape clothing web sites, since they often categorize already.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#338
The human brain is still very good at sensing something is not right and these photos all still look fake. Like bad movie CGI. It’s impressive stuff but if anyone is thinking they could replace a real photo with this and pass it off as real they’re making a mistake.

The tech is super interesting but this space is also a good example of getting the last 1% working is going to be a lot harder than getting the first 99% to work.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#340

What I find sketchy is that it is not easy to find out who is behind this service. The norm is an about us or a link to a parent site. Briefly skimmed the legalese (ToS & Privacy) and still not clear who these people or where they operate from. The linkedin link shows 8 people working there, mostly in BD from outside the US. I don't think there is a nefarious purpose going on, i.e. getting people to sign up and steal…

The FAQ https://generated.photos/faq directly answers this: it's made by the same company as Icons8, which has a long track record. The founder is Ivan Braun, who is indeed a real person (I've known him since the Icons8 days).
Post reply on HN