Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)
331–340 of 428 posts
Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)
#332Anytime I hear about outdoor advertising I think of a quote I saw in the book Civilized to Death. A long time ago man saw Times Square and sat in silence. A few people asked him what he thought. He said this would be beautiful if I couldn't read.
Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)
#333Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Please don't take HN threads into flamewar. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
With that in mind, your silence towards the potential nationalist for doing something that _also_ goes against the spirit of HN* is rather... curious.
*bringing up what's at the very least off-topic trivia (i.e. noise, or "fluff" as Graham would call it).
Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)
#334Anytime I hear about outdoor advertising I think of a quote I saw in the book Civilized to Death. A long time ago man saw Times Square and sat in silence. A few people asked him what he thought. He said this would be beautiful if I couldn't read.
Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)
#335As an American moving to SP, this was one of the most striking things when I first arrived by air. It's buildings, as far as the eye can see, and it looks different somehow: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2F... Then you realize later that it's all architecture, free of advertising. Sadly, it's not completely clean - on the way from GRU there's still a decent amount of high-standing billboar…
Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)
#336Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)
#337Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Can you elaborate on this? I've always thought a mural was just a type of graffiti? According to Wikipedia it’s the opposite: a graffiti is a type of mural [1]. However at least in French and in Italian a graffiti is an inscription on a wall, often done as vandalism, while a mural(e) is more like a fresco which often takes the full wall. As a French, for me this [2] is a mural and this [3] is a graffiti. [1]: https…
Is graffiti always text? I know it's common but I didn't realise it was a rule. What about something like this https://maps.app.goo.gl/oCbe2DZW1vqyXJ2h9?g_st=ic
Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)
#338Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please don't take HN threads into flamewar. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Contrariwise to your assumption I was not trying to bring a flamewar up, even if feeling the need to point that out. With that in mind, your silence towards the potential nationalist for doing something that _also_ goes against the spirit of HN* is rather... curious. *bringing up what's at the very least off-topic trivia (i.e. noise, or "fluff" as Graham would call it).
If there's another comment that you feel should have been moderated but wasn't, I'd be happy to take a look, but I'd need a link.
Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)
#339Canberra, Australia (the capital) also has banned outdoor advertising since the 1930s (except near the airport): https://www.abc.net.au/canberra/programs/breakfast/should-ad...
Worth noting that ‘since the 1930s’ ≈ ‘since the city was founded’.
Re: Sao Paulo: A city with no outdoor advertisements (2013)
#340This is a great policy for the city but this killed half of Liberdade's soul, because our little Tokyo had to also pull down all our their Japan-evoking signage. See a sample of the neighborhood in the 80s: https://quandoacidade.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/238.jpg