Live data from Hacker News

Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%

usatoday.com

331–340 of 593 posts

Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%

#331

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wealthy people pay almost all the taxes. the top 10% pay 71% of taxes and the top 25% pay 87%. 75% of the country contributes nearly nothing but complaints.

> top 25% pay 87% Wow, this is pretty eye-opening.

Only in regards to income taxes which may include large corporations. It doesn't include all the other taxes that nearly everyone pays.

Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%

#332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> personal preference is to trigger a recession and reduce inflation These aren't binary outcomes. Tight money does nothing to ease supply-side bottlenecks. It does little to target demand displaced by rising energy prices. If those are the principal drivers of inflation, tightening could depress non-energy demand in a way that causes a recession without alleviating inflation. Stagflation. (To be clear, we're not at…

Through their actions they’re revealing that all of the excuses thus far were a lie. “Chip shortage”, “wood shortage”, “salmon shortage”, were all fake and overblown, and the real problem was too much money the whole time.

You really think that every manufacturer on the planet is conspiring to make people think there is a chip shortage?

Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%

#333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The administration did not cut production. Covid did. The oil industry is dragging their feet.

We were net exporters during covid under the last admin. This is the policy the current admin enacted that cut our production: https://www.csis.org/analysis/biden-makes-sweeping-changes-o... Please point to something that supports your theory that "covid did it" and oil companies are "dragging their feet". - edit, at my post limit - @vel0city: Banning new leases two years ago hurt our production output. Banning new s…

> But since companies with existing leases will not be affected, the near-term impact on exploration and production as well as royalties to states will be limited.

> A more permanent leasing ban would have a significant impact, although visible offshore production declines may not materialize for up to 10 years, given the typical timeframe for planning, exploration, appraisal, and development.

My source pointing that the current admin's actions haven't significantly changed things today is your own article.

https://www.csis.org/analysis/biden-makes-sweeping-changes-o...

Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%

#334
post #251

The returns that capital demands (and the government obliges to) are ultimately unsustainable. That's the core problem here. Rising wages? There has been no meaningful real increase in wages in 40 years despite a massive increase in productivity. Profits keep going up and up. The expectations for profits keep going up. The problem here is that the people who make companies possible don't get to share in the proceeds…

I think wages only can go up with abundant energy.

This time around interest is lagging inflation by atleast 1 year.

In the 70s the rate and salaries increased BEFORE the inflation occured = inflation was rate/salary driven and because debt level was lower.

Today salaries are not increasing 10% per year for most people.

So I actually think the interest rate hike increases the scarcity inflation eventually since energy production need low interest loans to build new sources.

The only sure thing about the hike is that ZERO new companies will be created, for good and for bad.

Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%

#335
post #251

The returns that capital demands (and the government obliges to) are ultimately unsustainable. That's the core problem here. Rising wages? There has been no meaningful real increase in wages in 40 years despite a massive increase in productivity. Profits keep going up and up. The expectations for profits keep going up. The problem here is that the people who make companies possible don't get to share in the proceeds…

Thanks to serfdom, we have IPhones and Gadgets.

Which consumer products do you own come from Norway?

Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%

#336

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a double edged sword, naturally. Old debt becomes cheaper in equal measure to more expensive new debt.

yes I don't think it's the case that inflation doesn't hurt the lower half of earners at all, but this entire post is filled with people assuming that inflation hurts poor people the most. I don't know where that assumption comes from but it doesn't make sense to me.

Someone who could just manage to feed their family on a paycheck-to-paycheck salary before now cannot. That hurts in a way that is .. difficult to compare to when your belly is always full.

Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%

#337

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Norway example is really annoying. It keeps coming back as an example to follow, when everybody knows it is a complete outlier that cannot be reproduced elsewhere. Norway is sitting on a gigantic pile of offshore gas that it uses to generate massive profits that go into a huge fund they don't know what to do with, all of that for a 5M population that drowns into social programs. There is literally no country in t…

In Norway the state is rich. The people not so much. Best way for Norwegians to feel rich is to travel abroad.

Norway's state oil&gas revenue pays and subsidizes pensions, tuition free education and healthcare while actually growing rather than shrinking most of the time. Unless your definition of feeling rich is the government buying you a lambo I'd feel very rich in Norway based on services provided at no or little cost alone.

Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%

#339
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Fed can only manage monetary policy. If Congress wants to fix the petroleum energy crisis with policy, it has the tools to do so.

High gas prices are mostly a function of insufficient refining capacity, short of the government building more, I dont see a policy fix here. The market is responding to the probability of an electric future.

Where is all this new demand for gasoline coming from? I know a lot of people are back to in-person work and school, but a substantial number of people are now full or part-time WFH where they weren't before 2020. On top of that we've "unexpectedly" lost over a million people in that same time frame. Shouldn't demand for gasoline be lower than it was before the pandemic?

Re: Federal Reserve raises rates by 0.75%

#340
post #251

The returns that capital demands (and the government obliges to) are ultimately unsustainable. That's the core problem here. Rising wages? There has been no meaningful real increase in wages in 40 years despite a massive increase in productivity. Profits keep going up and up. The expectations for profits keep going up. The problem here is that the people who make companies possible don't get to share in the proceeds…

>Oil hasn't gotten more expensive to produce

a huge chunk of oil has been taken off the global market and refining capacity can't be increased instantly

>After going into massive debt for college

college used to possible to be paid for with a part time job before the government started handing out loans which jacked up prices

Post reply on HN