Live data from Hacker News

Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

support.google.com

331–340 of 441 posts

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#331
post #212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How about "Whereas", "Insofaras", "Notwithstanding", "Thetruthofthematter", or "Despiteallobjections"? Didn't try them, but these were "reserved words" in Go (actually an easter egg) until 2017 ( https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2489803/notwithstanding-... ).

This is the strangest parsing fact I've learned since PHP having a token named T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM. (Because the parser was developed in Israel.) https://stackoverflow.com/questions/592322/php-expects-t-paa...

I don’t speak hebrew but someone online said that this is an unnecessarily literal translation of "double colon" and it’s not what most developers would call it. Take that with a grain of salt though.

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#332

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the strangest parsing fact I've learned since PHP having a token named T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM. (Because the parser was developed in Israel.) https://stackoverflow.com/questions/592322/php-expects-t-paa...

I don’t speak hebrew but someone online said that this is an unnecessarily literal translation of "double colon" and it’s not what most developers would call it. Take that with a grain of salt though.

Oooh now I wonder if it literally means "dual intestine".

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#333
post #325

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Conversely I would prefer to work in a place like that. Professionalism at scale isn’t achievable by tolerating idiotic behaviour and being nice to everyone no matter how dangerously stupid they are being. There is a point where someone has to put their foot down and demand things be done properly, otherwise the inevitable consequence is a giant mess leading to disaster. You might be used to small startup teams with…

> There is a point where someone has to put their foot down and demand things be done properly, otherwise the inevitable consequence is a giant mess leading to disaster. This is what management is for, too bad tech companies are too cool for that and prefer to live out lord of the flies.

I’d rather have software engineers make the decisions about software engineering than insist managers do that job.

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#334
post #316
post #213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It helped me empathize with young engineers dealing with their first high responsibility bug. About 4 years ago, I was managing a guy right out of school who pushed a minor bug that broke real-time risk calculations for a major multinational financial institution in the middle of the European trading day, prior to the NYC open, and people were yelling over email that they were trading blind. Someone had committed an…

It's your fault, you were the manager, the yelling should not even have leaked to the developer, it should have stopped with you. Edit: if you are managing someone who is new in a job, it's your job to make sure they don't push bugs to break important stuff in the first place.

I don't think we can assign blame in a complicated situation based on a two-paragraph retelling, please have a bit more empathy.

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#335

Took me right back one of many detentions I served at school, when Mr B Swales set us the challenge of finding a grammatically correct English sentence with five ands in a row. The answer was as follows: The landlord of the "Dog and Partridge" pub commissioned a signwriter to letter a new board outside. On looking at the work, the landlord declared that he liked the colour but would prefer more spacing between Dog an…

A russian equivalent based on the fact that foreign words aren't declined: Человек человеку волк, а зомби зомби зомби

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#336

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t speak hebrew but someone online said that this is an unnecessarily literal translation of "double colon" and it’s not what most developers would call it. Take that with a grain of salt though.

Oooh now I wonder if it literally means "dual intestine".

Nope, it's literally "twice colon" where colon is specifically the punctuation mark. פעמים נקודותיים

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#337

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oooh now I wonder if it literally means "dual intestine".

Nope, it's literally "twice colon" where colon is specifically the punctuation mark. פעמים נקודותיים

Ahh dreams dashed.

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#338

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the strangest parsing fact I've learned since PHP having a token named T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM. (Because the parser was developed in Israel.) https://stackoverflow.com/questions/592322/php-expects-t-paa...

I don’t speak hebrew but someone online said that this is an unnecessarily literal translation of "double colon" and it’s not what most developers would call it. Take that with a grain of salt though.

Seems plausible since afaik the other constants were in English, so this seems to be a developer's joke.

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#339

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nope, it's literally "twice colon" where colon is specifically the punctuation mark. פעמים נקודותיים

Ahh dreams dashed.

I thought we were talking about colons?

Re: Including “And. And. And. And. And.” in a Google doc causes it to crash

#340
post #259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Indicating sarcasm is not necessarily ruining it though. Look at IRL sarcasm, it will generally be accompanied with the right tone of voice and expression / body language that make its presence unequivocal. That doesn’t necessarily ruin it

Written works have had sarcasm, irony, and related forms of wit for as long as they've existed. While people might miss the mark, it doesn't mean we should just give it up as impossible just because we're now writing comments online. And it probably says more about me than the writer, but I always cringe when I see /s since it seems to be implying "Hey, in case you're a bit slow , this is sarcasm. Glad to help." Sarc…

/s is just a wink, you still have to figure out whether the person did really fart and if so how they concealed it. You’re just here farting and calling it higher smelling because you think you’re the only one smelling it.
Post reply on HN