Live data from Hacker News

Facebook Renames to Meta

about.facebook.com

331–340 of 1001 posts

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#331

Still a terrible, terrible organisation that's detrimental to societies and humankind as such.

Twitter is 100 times more toxic than FB, but somehow everyone is focused on FB. I guess someone powerful is annoyed.

Journalists live their lives on Twitter.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#332

Other interesting things said during the keynote: "and frankly, as we've heard your feedback more broadly, we're working on making it so you can log into Quest with an account other than your personal Facebook account. We're starting to test support for work accounts soon, and we're working on making a broader shift here within the next year. I know this is a big deal for a lot of people. Not everyone wants their soc…

   We'll continue supporting sideloading and linking to PCs
I see this as a tacit approval of the thriving network of pirate games, something like the Adobe Photoshop model of proliferating and becoming the de facto platform.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#333
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well that's just your opinion MAAAN.

We just need Microsoft and Netflix to rebrand AAAAA

Microsoft should be in there, but the M in this case is from Facebook->Meta... so you need Facebook to rebrand again for AAAAA.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#334

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If there is going to be a metaverse, I'm not sure I want Facebook to own it. It's like a bad sci-fi pulp story. One step closer to real life Shadowrun.

Or Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash, which coined the term "metaverse."

And had a virus that transmitted to humans via the metaverse. Very apt for Facebook to choose this actually

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#335
post #211

My god, if you get it, you get it. They are going all in on metaverse / have decided that the future of oculus is the primary long term bet, not facebook itself. And they have the money to make it so. This is incredibly scary, and probably a good investment.

I don't think this downplays Oculus, but they also announced today that they are going to start scaling back Facebook integration with Oculus and start allowing other login methods besides Facebook. Unfortunately outside of Tweets, this is the best story I found on it at the moment: https://www.ign.com/articles/oculus-facebook-requirement-end...

Keep in mind he used very specific working "personal facebook account" and just announced a new company name 'Meta.'

To me that points to a 'log in with Meta' option.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#336

If there is going to be a metaverse, I'm not sure I want Facebook to own it. It's like a bad sci-fi pulp story. Given their investment and research, I wonder if they should open it all up (even if contradictory to short-term gains in ad revenue) so it has a chance to grow? Federate it a bit more than they are comfortable with, to at least give it a chance. I could see this flubbing out hard otherwise. I'm personally…

>It's like a bad sci-fi pulp story.

That feeling when you don't have a single original idea, and unironically view Black Mirror episodes as a blueprint.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#337
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It isn't the users, it's the platform and underlying philosophy of the business. They are factory-farming humans' attention; it's no wonder the result is dystopian.

I see this sentiment posted often on HN but I've seen no social media that didn't eventually become toxic or that didn't feed on human attention, this website included. What good is a platform if nobody pays attention to it? And if people are paying attention to it, how do you plan to prevent them from fighting, competing with each other over every little thing, and spreading misinformation?

HN (and other discussion sites like lwn.net) are way different in this regard. Also, it's not a social medium but a forum. Before social media we had many fora. The success of each of them depended on their specialization and moderation. The more specialized the forum was, the easier it was to keep order because there were fewer trolls. Also the users knew they should not feed the trolls. We hat heated discussions, dramas, long-time users leaving the fora. But practically speaking everything was transparent. Nobody manipulated your "news feed" like they do with FB (an Instagram) to maximize revenue. Nobody suggested to me I should join some fringe groups, repeatedly. Nobody showed to me the stupidities some of my friends wrote on some groups (some of them not even knowing all their friends see it).

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#338

I suspect we will be awash in critical comments shortly, so let me just say I'm kind of excited about this. Don't forget that the internet was originally a military project. I'm excited to see a huge corporation going all in on VR and AR. It has the potential to be really interesting technology, and the research in displays, sensors, and other hardware and software won't go to waste. If "Meta" is the new ARPANET, I w…

Except ARPANET and CERN conducted their research for a larger audience, much of it making its way to the public. FB/Meta research is largely proprietary.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#339
post #195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought the market has repeatedly shown there isn't much demand for persistent virtual worlds?

> the market has repeatedly shown there isn't much demand for persistent virtual worlds I don't know if you have a more narrow view of this idea or specifically mean VR/AR, but that just sounds like what massively multiplayer online (MMO) games such as Ultima Online, Everquest, and World of Warcraft are. I think Roblox is even a broader use case, though I am fairly unfamiliar with that. MMOs have been very viable fro…

MMORPGs are not really persistent worlds though.

They're an environment crafted to scratch a dopamine itch by providing instant gratification for work, with a social layer attached on top. I write this as someone who used to play MUDs back before MMORPGs even became a thing.

Unless Facebook is planning on releasing their own WoW branded as the metaverse, I don't see how they're the same.

Re: Facebook Renames to Meta

#340

My god, if you get it, you get it. They are going all in on metaverse / have decided that the future of oculus is the primary long term bet, not facebook itself. And they have the money to make it so. This is incredibly scary, and probably a good investment.

Not a chance. I've been wrong about a lot of things tech, probably even most things, but this isn't something I think most people want. Metaverses have always been niche. Most people don't like things attached to their head. Remember 3D TVs? But, perhaps you and they are right. For the first time in my life, I honestly feel like 'if this is the future, I want no part in it.' Please don't take this as like, suicidal o…

>this isn't something I think most people want.

I think it is. Not the current crap hardware, but bit further advanced it definitely has a place.

The gamers are basically on board already, streamers would benefit too and porn has a big chunk in VR already.

Sharp headset that can render text clearly would be huge.

Post reply on HN