331–333 of 333 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Didn't the US government just drain the crypto accounts of some online hacker collective that ransomwared that petrol pipeline? Also the verb is "garnisheed". They're not putting parsely on it :)
> Also the verb is "garnisheed". No, its “garnish”, past-tense “garnished”. > They're not putting parsely on it :) No, but its the exact same verb, just a different sense.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Also the verb is "garnisheed". No, its “garnish”, past-tense “garnished”. > They're not putting parsely on it :) No, but its the exact same verb, just a different sense.
No it's not, the word is garnishee
Earlier quoted context omitted.
But is the easiest metric to guage test quality. What I’m saying is this code is probably not well tested
This code isn't tested at all. They messed up copying code from a previous implementation, that's how bad this is. If they had had a few basic tests in place they would've spotted this before it even had a chance to be a problem.